Cited by 1,593Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy

Gilbert, Paul·2014·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Compassion focused therapy (CFT) is rooted in an evolutionary, functional analysis of basic social motivational systems (e.g., to live in groups, form hierarchies and ranks, seek out sexual, partners help and share with alliances, and care for kin) and different functional emotional systems (e.g., to respond to threats, seek out resources, and for states of contentment/safeness). In addition, about 2 million years ago, (pre-)humans began to evolve a range of cognitive competencies for reasoning, reflection, anticipating, imagining, mentalizing, and creating a socially contextualized sense of self. These new competencies can cause major difficulties in the organization of (older) motivation and emotional systems. CFT suggests that our evolved brain is therefore potentially problematic because of its basic 'design,' being easily triggered into destructive behaviours and mental health problems (called 'tricky brain'). However, mammals and especially humans have also evolved motives and emotions for affiliative, caring and altruistic behaviour that can organize our brain in such a way as to significantly offset our destructive potentials. CFT therefore highlights the importance of developing people's capacity to (mindfully) access, tolerate, and direct affiliative motives and emotions, for themselves and others, and cultivate inner compassion as a way for organizing our human 'tricky brain' in prosocial and mentally healthy ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjc.12043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 165 · Cited by 1,593

Authors
Gilbert, P.
Affiliations
Mental Health Research Unit Asbourne Centre Kingsway Hospital Derby UK
Corresponding author
Gilbert, Paul
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-21
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
6-41
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2060224295
Cited by
1,593
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 195 · 2025: 229 · 2024: 200 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13
FWCI
46.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
compassion-focused therapy, evolutionary psychology, emotional systems, prosocial behavior, self-compassion, selfhood, affiliation, shame, self-criticism, mentalization
MeSH terms
Affect, Emotions, Empathy, Humans, Motivation, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review