Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 407

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence and prevalence of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gether, L., Overgaard, L.K., Egeberg, A., Thyssen, J.P.·2018·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The exact prevalence and incidence of rosacea remain unknown, although it is a common condition associated with severe noncutaneous diseases. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the published literature to examine the global incidence and prevalence of rosacea. METHODS: A systematic review of population-based and dermatological outpatient studies reporting the incidence and/or prevalence of rosacea was performed using three electronic medical databases: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Data were extracted and a proportion meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled proportions. RESULTS: In total 32 studies were included examining a total of 41 populations with 26 519 836 individuals. Twenty-two populations were from Europe, three from Africa, four from Asia, nine from North America and three from South America. The pooled proportion of individuals with rosacea was 5·46% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4·91-6·04] in the general population and 2·39% (95% CI 1·56-3·39) among dermatological outpatients. Self-reported rosacea gave higher prevalence estimates than rosacea diagnosed by clinical examination, suggesting a low specificity of questionnaires based on symptoms. Rosacea affected both women (5·41%, 95% CI 3·85-7·23) and men (3·90%, 95% CI 3·04-4·87), and mostly those aged 45-60 years. CONCLUSIONS: We estimated the global prevalence of rosacea based on published data and found that 5·46% of the adult population is affected. However, the prevalence of rosacea depended on the diagnostic method, with higher estimates in questionnaire studies of rosacea symptoms and lower estimates in health registries with International Classification of Diseases codes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjd.16481

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 407

Metadata

Authors
Gether, L., Overgaard, L. K., Egeberg, A., & Thyssen, J. P.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2018-05-31
Volume
179
Issue
2
Pages
282-289
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790847525
Cited by
407
References
1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and prevalence of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjd.16481
The paper
Gether, L., Overgaard, L. K., Egeberg, A., & Thyssen, J. P. (2018). Incidence and prevalence of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.16481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.