‘You're in this world now’: Students’, teachers’, and parents’ experiences of school transition and how they feel it can be improved
Open accessAbstract
Background: Primary–secondary school transition is a major life event for 11‐year‐old children in the United Kingdom and can also be a stressful period for parents and teachers. However, most research focuses on the impact of transition on children's academic performance and social well‐being and we have a limited understanding of their emotional experiences in the lead up to and during the transition, from the perspective of key stakeholders: students, parents, and teachers. Aims: To explore transfer students’, parents’, and teachers’ experiences in the lead up to and over the transition period, and how they feel it could be improved. Sample: The sample consisted of 45 year seven students, 8 year seven parents, 8 year seven teachers, and 8 year six teachers, recruited from five primary and five secondary schools. Method: Students participated in face‐to‐face semi‐structured focus groups and adults in asynchronous online focus groups. Transcribed audio‐recordings were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Students, parents, and teachers were shown to navigate a similar process over primary–secondary school transition. All talked about managing their own and others’ emotions, relationships, and expectations. These were shaped by shared communication across primary and secondary schools and between the stakeholders, and impacted by how good transition provision was seen to be. Conclusions: There is a need to understand the transition period from the perspective of students, teachers, and parents, to improve school transition. This information will allow us to design emotional centred support interventions that reflect these lived experiences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084 · see citing works
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.2.90 · Cited by 2,616 · see citing works
How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes
Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x16639015 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
West, P., Sweeting, H., & Young, R. (2010) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671520802308677 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Assessing pupil concerns about transition to secondary school
Rice, F., Frederickson, N., & Seymour, J. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709910x519333 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
van Rens, M., Haelermans, C., Groot, W., & Maassen van den Brink, H. (2018) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-017-0063-2 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Vaz, S., Parsons, R., Falkmer, T., Passmore, A. E., & Falkmer, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089874 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bagnall, C. L., Fox, C. L., & Skipper, Y. (2021) · Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs · doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12507 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationBagnall, C. L., Skipper, Y., & Fox, C. L. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12485 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bagnall, C. L., Skipper, Y., & Fox, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Keele University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bagnall, Charlotte Louise
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-13
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 206-226
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2921784536
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 25.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- transition to secondary school, emotional experience, student experience, parental experiences, teacher experiences, emotion regulation
- MeSH terms
- School Teachers, Child, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Parents, Personal Satisfaction, Schools, Students, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review