Cited by 200Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Environments and Student OutcomesPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Assessing pupil concerns about transition to secondary school

Rice, Frances, Frederickson, Norah, Seymour, Joanna·2011·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Background The primary-secondary transition can negatively affect pupils' emotional and psychological adjustment. However, methods for assessing concerns regarding secondary school are limited. A reliable and valid measure of transition-related concerns would be useful both in evaluating and shaping the content and delivery of universal and targeted transition support programmes. Aims To assess the validity of a quantitative self-report measure of school concerns as an assessment tool during the primary-secondary school transition. Sample A UK sample of 147 Year 6 primary school pupils and 263 Year 7 secondary school pupils. Method Self-reports of school concerns and school liking as well as self-reported and peer assessments on a range of psychological adjustment measures were collected. Results The School Concerns Questionnaire (SCQ) showed good reliability at primary and secondary school. Secondary concerns reduced significantly post-transition. Three factors emerged from an exploratory factor analysis of the SCQ and the pattern of results was replicated for post-transition concerns. Pupils with higher school concerns at secondary school reported reduced liking of school and reduced trust and respect for teachers. The SCQ was associated with generalized anxiety and female gender both pre-and post-transition. Peer problems and depression were associated with pre- and post-transition concerns, respectively. Conclusions The SCQ is a simple to complete, reliable, and valid too…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000709910x519333

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rice, F., Frederickson, N., & Seymour, J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rice, Frances
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-09
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
244-263
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W1588902549
Cited by
198
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
27.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
transition to secondary school, psychological adjustment, school liking, generalized anxiety disorder, peer problems, depression
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude, Child, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Peer Group, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Social Adjustment, Social Environment, Social Support, Students, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review