The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical evaluation of the contribution of trust to effective Technology Enhanced Learning in the workplace: A literature review
Abstract
This paper offers a critical review of the literature that explores the building and development of trust in workplace learning, particularly in a virtual context and its implications for T echnology E nhanced L earning ( TEL ) in business. Trust is increasingly recognised as important in both business and education, and is the focus of increasing attention in relation to the virtual environment. TEL offers a range of potential benefits, but adoption levels remain low. However, there are indications that trust may be a significant factor in both low workplace participation in TEL and its effectiveness as a learning medium. Although savings in both money and time are the main perceived advantages of TEL , this review highlights the positive role of face‐to‐face contact in increasing TEL take‐up and effectiveness, even though this diminishes cost savings. This paper highlights the scant level of research into TEL , particularly in work situations, and the extent to which trust has been overlooked in this context. In the light of this gap in knowledge, further investigations are suggested to contribute to understanding the issues affecting TEL in the workplace.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, privacy concerns can reduce learner participation [80,81].”
From Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning (2024) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cites
Swift Trust and Temporary Groups
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996) · Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research · doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n9 · Cited by 1,982
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759909376464 · Cited by 1,236 · cited 1×
“In a learning context, McCroskey and Teven (1999) contend that competence, evidence of caring and trust are all necessary for an instructor to be perceived as credible.”
BackgroundTrust—the fundamental bond in global collaboration
Child, J. (2001) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/s0090-2616(01)00033-x · Cited by 326
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1177/108056990006300402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13678860701347164 · DOI
- Blomqvist K., 2002, Partnering in the dynamic environment: the role of trust in asymmetric technology partnership formation
- 10.1177/1059601106286881 · DOI
- Brown S. D., 2009, Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality, 209
- 10.1177/014920639101700307 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-89613-1 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · DOI · Paper page
- Donath J. S., 1999, Communities in cyberspace, 27
- Drucker P. F., 1999, Management challenges for the 21st century
- Fairhurst P., 2011, Creating social networks for L&D, The Training Journal, 2011, 50
- 10.1080/03634520009379209 · DOI
- 10.1145/2214091.2214125 · DOI
- Gignac F., 2005, Building successful virtual teams
- Grover A., 2010, Cutting‐edge social media approaches to business education: teaching with Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter, second life, and blogs, 7
- 10.1080/08838159809364462 · DOI · Paper page
- Handy C., 1995, Trust and the virtual organization, Harvard Business Review, 73, 40
- 10.1002/jsc.714 · DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872 · DOI · Paper page
- Järvenpää E., 2001, Humans on the net: information and communication technology (ICT), work organization and human beings, 229
- 10.1287/orsc.10.6.791 · DOI · Paper page
- Johnson G., 2008, Exploring corporate strategy
- Kimble C. Li F.&Barlow A.(2000).Effective virtual teams through communities of practice. Paper 2000. · DOI
- Knowles M., 1990, The adult‐learner: a neglected species
- Kostner J., 2001, Bionic e‐teamwork: how to build collaborative virtual teams at hyperspeed
- Kouzes J. M., 2012, The leadership challenge: how to make extraordinary things happen in organizations
- Lewicki R. J., 2008, Landmark papers on trust, 388
- Loos E. E., 2008, The social dynamics of information and communication technology
- Lyon F., 2012, Handbook of research methods on trust
- Mason R., 2008, E‐learning and social networking handbook: resources for higher education
- 10.2307/258792 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/21515581.2011.552424 · DOI · Paper page
- Miller L., 2010, Market research for online communities in the NHS: a report to the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement
- Moore M. G., 1993, Theoretical principles of distance education, 22
- Mullins L. J., 2013, Management and organisational behaviour
- Myers S. A., 2006, Handbook of instructional communication: rhetorical and relational perspectives, 67
- Ossiansson E., 2010, Cutting‐edge social media approaches to business education: teaching with Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter, second life, and blogs, 117
- Preece J., 2011, Interaction design: beyond human‐computer interaction
- Rintala N., 2008, The social dynamics of information and communication technology, 133
- 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1080/10919391003711050 · DOI
- 10.1080/03634520701573284 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/104973150001000409 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0007-6813(05)80058-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00366.x · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470615782.ch9 · DOI
- 10.1177/108056990106400108 · DOI
- Volchok E., 2010, Virtual teamwork: mastering the art and practice of online learning and corporate collaboration, 3
- Wainfan L., 2004, Challenges in virtual collaboration: videoconferencing, and audioconferencing, and computer‐mediated communications
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00400.x · DOI
- 10.1177/009365001028001004 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393957 · DOI
- Zand D. E., 1997, The leadership triad: knowledge, trust and power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning
Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5 · Cited by 499
“However, privacy concerns can reduce learner participation 80,81 .”
Ley, T. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12835 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Short, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Short, Heather
- ORCID
- Short, Heather
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1014-1022
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2105900126
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
- Keywords
- trust, technology-enhanced learning, workplace learning, virtual learning environments, e-learning adoption, face-to-face contact, business education, learning effectiveness, cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical evaluation of the contribution of trust to effective Technology Enhanced Learning in the workplace: A literature review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjet.12187
- The paper
- Short, H. (2014). A critical evaluation of the contribution of trust to effective Technology Enhanced Learning in the workplace: A literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12187