Fostering deeper learning in a flipped classroom: Effects of knowledge graphs versus concept maps
Abstract
Flipped classroom is an approach that has been increasingly used in K‐12 and higher education. Many studies on the flipped classroom have focused on student behaviors, with inadequate attention to student thinking, which is crucial to learning. Meanwhile, prior studies have examined the effects of visualization tools, such as concept map, on improving student learning through in‐depth thinking. Another related approach is knowledge graph, which presents a set of entities and their relationships in a graph as well as in a machine language for further processing and reasoning. It has a potential to support collaborative knowledge construction by automatic combination of individual knowledge graphs. To compare the effects of knowledge graph and concept map on student learning in a flipped classroom, we conducted an experimental study in fifth grade class at an elementary school. Students in the experimental group used a knowledge graph tool in the Learning Cell System, while those in the control group used a concept map tool, XMind, to support their learning of ancient Chinese poetry. The results showed that learning with knowledge graph resulted in better performance in the breadth and depth of subject knowledge as reflected in the students’ learning products (ie, concept maps or knowledge graphs). Practitioner Notes: What is already known about this topic The flipped classroom can improve student learning by enabling active participation and interactions. The concept map is an effective learning tool that can foster meaningful understanding and higher order thinking in both traditional and flipped classrooms. The knowledge graph is a related tool that presents a set of entities and their semantic relationships in a graph as well as in a machine language to support further processing. The knowledge graph can support collaborative knowledge construction by automatic combination of individual knowledge graphs. What this paper adds We conducted an experimental study to compare the effects of knowledge graph and concept map on student learning in a flipped classroom. Compared with concept map, learning with knowledge graph resulted in better performance in the breadth and depth of subject knowledge as reflected in the students’ learning products (ie, concept maps or knowledge graphs). Implications for practice and/or policy Learning with knowledge graph fosters more cognitive engagement in exploring the relationships between concepts represented in both individual and converged knowledge graphs. The converged knowledge graph offers the teacher a big picture of the entire class in student understanding. Relevant training should be provided to students and teachers for effective use and learning with the knowledge graph tool.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concept mapping facilitates students' organization and integration of knowledge, leading to improved understanding and retention.
“Concept mapping is a powerful educational tool that facilitates students' organization and integration of knowledge, leading to improved understanding and retention.”
From Concept mapping in STEM education: a meta-analysis of its impact on students' achievement (2004–2023) (2025) · cites this paper as Cui & Yu, 2019
Cites
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199 · see citing works
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 2,152 · see citing works
Yilmaz, R. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Group awareness in CSCL environments
Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huang, H., Hwang, G., & Chen, P. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13177 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Wang, X.-M., Wang, J.-L., Xu, S.-Y., & Xu, S.-J. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00554-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“…the relationships between concepts, especially linking newly learned concepts to prior knowledge and stimulating deep and meaningful learning (Cui & Yu, 2019), but also significantly improves students’achievement, motivation, and attitudes in different learning areas (Almulla & Alamri, 2021;…”
- Authors
- Cui, J., & Yu, S.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Shengquan
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-06-30
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2308-2328
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2953730302
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of the Chinese Ministry of Education (16JZD043)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- flipped classroom, knowledge graphs, concept maps, deep learning, visualization tools, classical Chinese poetry, elementary school students, Xmind, collaborative knowledge construction, cognitive engagement, fifth grade students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review