Participant or spectator? Comprehending the willingness of faculty to use intelligent tutoring systems in the artificial intelligence era
Abstract
The advancement of technology, especially the development and application of artificial intelligence, has deeply affected the education sector and brought opportunities for pedagogical adaptation. Intelligent tutoring systems, a major application of artificial intelligence in education, have drawn extensive concerns. However, in reality, the penetration rate of intelligent tutoring systems and the enthusiasm of faculty to use are still relatively low. This research examined the determinants of the willingness of faculty to use intelligent tutoring systems. Innovation diffusion theory was the theoretical basis of this research and it was adapted by incorporating perceived trust and experience. To gather data, a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey was performed and structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the data. The findings indicated that relative advantage, compatibility, perceived trust and experience are the contributing determinants of the willingness of faculty to use intelligent tutoring systems, while complexity has no significant effect. Meanwhile, complexity is significantly negatively affected by experience and compatibility. Relative advantage is significantly positively affected by perceived trust but not by complexity. Based on the research findings, relevant recommendations for encouraging faculty to use intelligent tutoring systems were proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In higher education, Wang et al. examined Chinese instructors' attitudes toward ITS, though their work emphasized identifying relevant factors rather than examining how trust dynamics are formed.
“In higher education, Wang et al. [117] examined Chinese instructors' attitudes toward ITS, though their work emphasized identifying relevant factors rather than examining how trust dynamics are formed.”
From Understanding the Practices, Perceptions, and (Dis)Trust of Generative AI among Instructors: A Mixed-methods Study in the U.S. Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as [117]
Cites
Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315581420 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Arming the public with artificial intelligence to counter social bots
Yang, K., Varol, O., Davis, C. A., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.115 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Nye, B. D. (2015) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant
du Boulay, B. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2016.93 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Self-citationDai, K., & Liu, Q. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108354 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Lyu, W., Zhang, S., Chung, T., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100383 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“In higher education, Wang et al. [117] examined Chinese instructors’ attitudes toward ITS, though their work emphasized identifying relevant factors rather than examining how trust dynamics are formed.”
- Authors
- Wang, S., Yu, H., Hu, X., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Hefei University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Jun
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-07-20
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1657-1673
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W3044610131
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- intelligent tutoring systems, faculty technology adoption, adoption intention, diffusion of innovation theory, perceived trust, perceived experience, relative advantage, compatibility, perceived complexity, artificial intelligence in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review