Cited by 213Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and Analytics

Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant

du Boulay, Benedict·2016·IEEE Intelligent Systems

Abstract

The field of artificial intelligence in education (AIED) uses techniques from AI and cognitive science to better understand the nature of learning and teaching and to build systems to help learners gain new skills or understand new concepts. This article studies metareviews and meta-analyses to make the case for blended learning, wherein the teacher can offload some work to AIED systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mis.2016.93

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
du Boulay, B.
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Published
2016-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
76-81
ISSN
1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550022464
Cited by
213
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, classroom assistants, blended learning, meta-analysis, learning and teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review