Cited by 411Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline and Blended LearningEducational Innovations and Technology

Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

Open access
Salas‐Pilco, Sdenka Zobeida, Yang, Yuqin, Zhang, Zhe·2022·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

Abstract The COVID‐19 pandemic has forced higher education institutions to implement online learning activities based on virtual platforms, allowing little time to prepare and train faculty members to familiarize students with digital technologies. While previous studies have looked at how students engaged with digital technologies in their learning activities, the characteristics of the student engagement in online learning remain underexplored. Therefore, a systematic review of the literature on student engagement in online learning in higher education is much needed. This article synthesizes the findings on student engagement in Latin American higher education institutions during the COVID‐19 pandemic. After reviewing the studies on online learning activities, this review examines student engagement from behavioural, cognitive and affective dimensions and identifies the main characteristics of student engagement from these tripartite dimensions. The implications of the findings for online learning in Latin American higher education are as follows: (a) to transform higher education, (b) to provide adequate professional training, (c) to improve Internet connectivity, (d) to ensure quality online learning in higher education and (e) to provide emotional support. These findings will provide valuable guidance for teachers, educational authorities and policy makers and help them make informed decisions to use effective strategies to support online learning in higher education institutions. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The COVID‐19 pandemic has disrupted the normal operation of higher education institutions across Latin America, impelling a shift from face‐to‐face instruction to online teaching and learning. Research on online learning in Latin American higher education has been conducted, but the findings and their implications are yet to be widely disseminated among researchers, practitioners and decision‐makers. What this paper adds Providing a systematic review of research on student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education institutions. Analyzing the construct of student engagement in online learning from tripartite dimensions—behavioral, cognitive and affective—in the Latin American higher education context. Identifying the characteristics associated to each dimension of student engagement in online learning. Implications for practice and/or policy The need to transform the higher education system in Latin America and beyond, at two levels: to improve Internet connectivity at the technological level and to ensure the quality of online education at the pedagogical level. The urgency to offer an adequate professional training regarding the use of new technologies in online learning environments. The significance for higher education institutions to provide emotional support for students during the COVID‐10 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.13190

Cites

70 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Challenges associated with online learning are a substantial hindrance to students' academic adaptation to online learning environments.

    “These challenges associated with online learning are a substantial hindrance to students’ academic adaption to online learning environments (Okan, 2020; Tüzün and Yörük Toraman, 2021; Salas-Pilco et al., 2022).”
  • Los estudios precedentes sobre IA en educación se centran en la gestión y administración de la enseñanza, no en la percepción de los estudiantes.

    “los estudios precedentes aún no recogen la percepción de los estudiantes, sino que se centran en los campos de la gestión y administración de la enseñanza (Salas-Pilco, 2022).”

    From Percepciones de estudiantes latinoamericanos sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial en la educación superior (2024) · cites this paper as Salas-Pilco, 2022

    The paper’s ‘Positive attitude toward online learning’ section reports studies of students’ attitudes toward online learning, but the claim concerns prior studies of AI in education. Neither that section nor the retrieved passages on student engagement address whether AI studies focused on teaching management and administration rather than student perceptions (searched: artificial intelligence, management, administration, student perceptions). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. *Bazán-­ Ramírez, A., Alfredo Quispe-­ Morales, R., Huauya-­ Quispe, P., & Ango-­ Aguilar, H. (2020). Accessibility, difficulties and advantages of the online study for COVID-­ 19 in a presential postgraduate on education. Propósitos y Representaciones , 8 , SPE(3), e659. https://doi.org/10.20511/ pyr20 20.v8nSP E3.659
  2. *Cárdenas Zea, M. P., Carranza Quimi, W. D., Plua Panta, K. A., Solís García, M., & Morales Torres, M. (2021). La educación virtual en tiempos del COVID-­ 19: Una experiencia en la maestría de Educación [Virtual education in times of COVID-­ 19: An experience in the Master of Education]. Revista Universidad y Sociedad , 13 (3), 243-­ 251.
  3. Charbonneau-­ Gowdy, P. (2016, June). Exploring the experiences of learners in a large-­ scale distance language learning program offered in countries across Latin America. Proceedings of the11th International Conference on e-­ Learning , Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, (pp. 37-­ 45). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
  4. *Domínguez-­ Torres, L. C., Vega-­ Peña, N. V., Sierra-­ Barbosa, D. O., & Pepín-­ Rubio, J. J. (2021). Aula invertida a distancia vs. aula invertida convencional: Un estudio comparativo [Remote flipped classroom vs. conventional flipped classroom: A comparative study]. Iatreia , 34 (3), 260-­ 265.
  5. Ferreira, D., MacLean, G., & Center, G. E. (2018). Andragogy in the 21st century: Applying the assumptions of adult learning online. Language Research Bulletin , 32 , 10-­ 19.
  6. Knopf, T., Stumpp, S., & Michelis, D. (2021, July). How online collaborative learning leads to improved online learning experience in higher education. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Social Media . https://doi.org/10.34190/ ESM.21.010
  7. *Lovón Cueva, M. A., & Cisneros Terrones, S. A. (2020). Impact of virtual classes on the university students in the context of COVID-­ 19 quarantine: The case of the PUCP. Propósitos y Representaciones , 8 , SPE(3), e588. https://doi.org/10.20511/ pyr20 20.v8nSP E3.588
  8. *Rodríguez Fernández, R. M., Peña Borrego, M. D., Aguilera Rodríguez, M. E., & Licea Jiménez, I. J. (2021). Experiencias en Cuba sobre la utilización de métodos colaborativos de aprendizaje en asignaturas de la carrera Ciencias de la Información [Experiences in Cuba on the use of collaborative learning methods in Information Sciences subjects]. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud , 32 (1), e1780. http:// scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ics/v32n1/ 2307-­ 2113-­ ics-­ 32-­ 01-­ e1780.pdf
  9. *Santos, L. M., Grisales, D., & Rico, J. S. (2021). Perception and technological accessibility of university students in southwest of the Dominican Republic during Covid-­ 19. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social , 10 (1), 145-­ 165. https://doi.org/10.15366/ riejs 2021.10.1.009
  10. *Sapien Aguilar, A. L., Pinon Howlet, L. C., delGutiérrez Diez, M. C., & Bordas Beltrán, J. L. (2020). Higher education during the health contingency COVID-­ 19: Use of ICTs as learning tools. Case study: Students of the Faculty of Accounting and Administration. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social , 78 , 309-­ 328. https://doi. org/10.4185/RLCS-­ 2020-­ 1479 · DOI
  11. Tyler, R. (1969). Educational evaluation: New roles, new methods: The sixty-­ eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II . University of Chicago Press.
  12. Yuzhaninova, E. R., & Moroz, V. V. (2018). The development of a student's value orientations on self-­ education and self-­ development in the internet. In L. V. Kotenko, M. O. Nasimov, & I. G. Dorohina (Eds.), 5th International Scientific Conference on Purposes, Tasks and Values of Education in Modern Conditions (pp. 20-­ 24). Vědecko Vydavatelské Centrum 'Sociosféra-­ CZ'.
  13. *Zúñiga Rodríguez, M., & Cáceres Mesa, M. L. (2021). El sentido escolar frente al COVID-­ 19. La percepción de estudiantes de universidades públicas en Hidalgo [The school sense in the face of COVID-­ 19. The perception of students from public universities in Hidalgo]. Revista Conrado , 17 (78), 46-­ 53. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ rc/v17n7 8/1990-­ 8644-­ rc-­ 17-­ 78-­ 46.pdf
  14. How to cite this article: Salas-­ Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-­ 19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology , 53, 593-­ 619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
  • Hang Seng University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yuqin
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-15
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
593-619
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W4213050051
Cited by
411
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 42
FWCI
21.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62107020)
  • Division of Undergraduate Education (ZNXBJY202108)
  • Central China Normal University (1100/30106200286)
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (21YJA880078)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
Keywords
student engagement, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, Latin American higher education, behavioral engagement, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, internet access, online education quality, emotional support for students, digital technologies in higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review