Cited by 47Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Risk of hospitalised bleeding in comparisons of oral anticoagulant options for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism

Open access
Lutsey, Pamela L., Zakai, Neil A., MacLehose, Richard F., Norby, Faye L., Walker, Rob F., Roetker, Nicholas S., Adam, Terrence J., Alonso, Alvaro·2019·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary: Understanding of the comparative bleeding risks of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapies for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is limited. Therefore, among anticoagulant‐naïve VTE patients, we conducted comparisons of apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin on the rate of hospitalised bleeding within 180 days of OAC initation. MarketScan databases for the time‐period from 2011 to 2016 were used and, for each OAC comparison, new users were matched with up to five initiators of a different OAC. The final analysis included 83 985 VTE patients, who experienced 1944 hospitalised bleeding events. In multivariable‐adjusted Cox regression models, rate of hospitalised bleeding was lower among new users of apixaban when compared to new users of rivaroxaban [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0·58 (0·41–0·80)] or warfarin [0·68 (0·50–0·92)]. Overall, the hospitalised bleeding rate was similar when comparing new users of rivaroxaban to new users of warfarin [0·98 (0·68–1·11)], though there was some suggestion that rivaroxaban was associated with lower bleeding risk among younger individuals. Findings from this large real‐world population concur with results from the randomised trial which found lower bleeding risk with apixaban versus warfarin and, for the first time, reveal a lower risk of bleeding in a comparison of apixaban versus rivaroxaban.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjh.15857

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A total of 5 studies were included for analysis: 1 thrombophilia clinic registry review, 1 retrospective review of veterans, and 3 database studies from the United States and Denmark.

    “A total of 5 studies were included for analysis: 1 study included a review of data from a thrombophilia clinic registry, 1 study included a review of retrospective data of veterans, and 3 were database studies from the United States and Denmark.”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in acute VTE in the real world (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Methods > Study population passage (page unavailable) identifies this paper as a retrospective cohort study using MarketScan health-claims databases, supporting its identification as a database study. It does not establish that five studies were included in the citing analysis or verify the claimed breakdown into a thrombophilia registry review, a veterans review, and three US and Danish database studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 5 selected studies assessed similar efficacy end points and outcomes but were slightly different in overall design and outcome definitions.

    “Although the 5 selected studies 8-11,14 assessed similar efficacy end points and outcomes, they were slightly different in terms of overall design and outcome definitions (Table 1).”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in acute VTE in the real world (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction and Methods describe this paper as a VTE anticoagulant comparison with a defined study design and hospitalised-bleeding outcome. It can therefore serve as one of the studies being compared, but it did not assess an efficacy endpoint such as recurrent VTE; its own text also cannot establish how all five studies’ designs and outcome definitions differed. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study by Lutsey et al was included only for major bleeding outcome because VTE events and minor bleeding events were not recorded.

    “The study by Lutsey et al was included only for major bleeding outcome because the VTE events and minor bleeding events were not recorded. 14”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in acute VTE in the real world (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction and Methods (Identification of hospitalised bleeding events) show that the study evaluated major hospitalised bleeding, not minor bleeding or recurrent VTE as outcomes. But Methods (Study population) explicitly records initial VTE events, so the statement that VTE events were not recorded is too broad. The paper also does not establish that the unavailability of those outcomes was the citing authors’ reason for including the study only for major bleeding. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutsey, P. L., Zakai, N. A., MacLehose, R. F., Norby, F. L., Walker, R. F., Roetker, N. S., Adam, T. J., & Alonso, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US)
  • Department of Epidemiology Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta GA USA
Corresponding author
Lutsey, Pamela L.
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-28
Volume
185
Issue
5
Pages
903-911
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W2929067776
Cited by
47
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Haematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01‐HL131579, R01‐HL122200)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
venous thromboembolism, oral anticoagulants, apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants, Female, Hemorrhage, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Venous Thromboembolism, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review