Towards a Revival of Indigenous Mobility in F rench G uiana? Contemporary Transformations of the W ayãpi and T eko Territories
Open accessAbstract
The goal of this article is to understand the contemporary transformations of indigenous territories in relation to several factors, including urbanisation, population growth, economic development and conservation policies. Using socio‐economic, governance and land use data, we explain the current territorial reorganisations of the W ayãpi and T eko indigenous peoples. We demonstrate the existence of an emerging ‘multi‐sited’ land use system that allows these indigenous peoples to benefit from resources in both urban and forest areas and ensures sovereignty over the territory. We emphasise the role of the delimitation of protected areas in catalysing identity claims and the process of land use reformulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Effective social policies and cash transfer programs led at federal level enabled several millions of Brazilians to leave poverty behind.
“If so, one should carefully consider the environmental benefits of the effective social policies and cash transfer programs (Barrientos, 2013 andTritsch et al., 2015) led at federal level to enable several millions of Brazilians to leave poverty behind.”
From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Tritsch et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tritsch, I., & Arvor, D. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.018 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- TRITSCH, I., MARMOEX, C., DAVY, D., THIBAUT, B., & GOND, V.
- Affiliations
- Ecologie des Forêts de Guyane (GF)
- Independent Researcher France
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement France
- Venue
- Bulletin of Latin American Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-34
- ISSN
- 0261-3050 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-9856
- OpenAlex
- W2064661728
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 16.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Bulletin of Latin American Research (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0010)
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
- Keywords
- Wayãpi, Teko, indigenous territories, territorial reorganization, indigenous mobility, protected area delimitation, indigenous identity, territorial sovereignty, urbanization, conservation policy, French Guiana
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review