Cited by 8Dental Health and Care UtilizationDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchDental Education, Practice, Research

Adults with learning disabilities experiences of using community dental services: Service user and carer perspectives

Open access
Lees, Carolyn, Poole, Helen, Brennan, Michelle, Irvine, Fiona·2017·British Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Accessible summary: The government and other organisations say that improving health care is important for people with learning disabilities. We asked people with learning disabilities and the people who look after them what it was like for them when they went to the dentist. Those we asked said that when they went to the dentist, they knew that those they saw knew about looking after their teeth. Some of those we talked to though said that certain things needed to be better. Background: The government alongside other health and social care organisation have identified the need to improve the care provided for people with learning disabilities. Materials and Methods: This service evaluation aimed to explore the experiences of people with learning disabilities and their carers who accessed community dental services using a qualitative research design. Adults with learning disabilities (n = 4) and their carers (n = 6) took part in one to one, face to face semi structured interviews. Results and Discussion: Generally, participants were satisfied with community dental services and in particular valued the skills and the competence of practitioners. However, when dissatisfaction was expressed this was generally as a result of poor communication and the transition from child to adult dental services. Conclusions: A number of recommendations are identified and discussed in relation to engagement with adults with learning disabilities and their carers in the development and delivery of community dental services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bld.12181

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Daly, B. Batchelor, P. Treasure, E. & Watt, R. (2013) Essential Public Health , Oxford University Press, London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lees, C., Poole, H., Brennan, M., & Irvine, F.
Affiliations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lees, Carolyn
Venue
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-20
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
114-120
ISSN
  • 0261-9997 (ISSN-L)
  • 1354-4187
  • 1468-3156
OpenAlex
W2575462849
Cited by
8
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • British Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
Keywords
learning disabilities, community dental care, service user experiences, caregiver perspectives, access to dental care, practitioner competence, service evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review