The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Open accessAbstract
Reliable estimation of the size or density of wild animal populations is very important for effective wildlife management, conservation and ecology. Currently, the most widely used methods for obtaining such estimates involve either sighting animals from transect lines or some form of capture‐recapture on marked or uniquely identifiable individuals. However, many species are difficult to sight, and cannot be easily marked or recaptured. Some of these species produce readily identifiable sounds, providing an opportunity to use passive acoustic data to estimate animal density. In addition, even for species for which other visually based methods are feasible, passive acoustic methods offer the potential for greater detection ranges in some environments (e.g. underwater or in dense forest), and hence potentially better precision. Automated data collection means that surveys can take place at times and in places where it would be too expensive or dangerous to send human observers. Here, we present an overview of animal density estimation using passive acoustic data, a relatively new and fast‐developing field. We review the types of data and methodological approaches currently available to researchers and we provide a framework for acoustics‐based density estimation, illustrated with examples from real‐world case studies. We mention moving sensor platforms (e.g. towed acoustics), but then focus on methods involving sensors at fixed locations, particularly hydrophones to survey marine mammals, as acoustic‐based density estimation research to date has been concentrated in this area. Primary among these are methods based on distance sampling and spatially explicit capture‐recapture. The methods are also applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial sound‐producing taxa. We conclude that, despite being in its infancy, density estimation based on passive acoustic data likely will become an important method for surveying a number of diverse taxa, such as sea mammals, fish, birds, amphibians, and insects, especially in situations where inferences are required over long periods of time. There is considerable work ahead, with several potentially fruitful research areas, including the development of (i) hardware and software for data acquisition, (ii) efficient, calibrated, automated detection and classification systems, and (iii) statistical approaches optimized for this application. Further, survey design will need to be developed, and research is needed on the acoustic behaviour of target species. Fundamental research on vocalization rates and group sizes, and the relation between these and other factors such as season or behaviour state, is critical. Evaluation of the methods under known density scenarios will be important for empirically validating the approaches presented here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures



Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, recordings from individual sensors provide limited information about the distance or number of callers, meaning that translating detections into reliable estimates of abundance or spatial distribution often requires additional sensor arrays or modelling approaches”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Marques et al. 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
Manly, B. F. J. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315273075 · Cited by 4,209
Introduction to Distance Sampling
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198506492.001.0001 · Cited by 3,073
Self-citationA Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280784 · Cited by 3,011
Analysis and Management of Animal Populations
Grand, J. B., Williams, B. K., Nichols, J. D., & Conroy, M. J. (2003) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802722 · Cited by 2,671
Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2001) · Cited by 2,557
Self-citationN ‐Mixture Models for Estimating Population Size from Spatially Replicated Counts
Royle, J. A. (2004) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2004.00142.x · Cited by 1,550
ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM REPEATED PRESENCE–ABSENCE DATA OR POINT COUNTS
Royle, J. A., & Nichols, J. D. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0777:eafrpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,364
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
Robinson, A. P. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2007.00485_5.x · Cited by 1,020
A digital acoustic recording tag for measuring the response of wild marine mammals to sound
Johnson, M. P., & Tyack, P. L. (2003) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2002.808212 · Cited by 913
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Bingham G., 2011, Status and Applications of Acoustic Mitigation and Monitoring Systems for Marine Mammals
- Cato D., 2006, Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2006, 453
- Clark C. W., 1995, Application of U.S. Navy underwater hydrophone arrays for scientific research on whales, Report of the International Whaling Commission, 44, 210
- Fristrup K. M., 1997, Combining visual and acoustic survey data to enhance density estimation, Report of the International Whaling Commission, 47, 933
- Hiby A. R., 1986, Analysis of cue‐counting and blow rate estimation experiments carried out during the 1984/85 IDCR minke whale assessment cruise, Report of the International Whaling Commission, 36, 473
- IUCN, 2003, Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0
- Mann D. A., 2010, Fish Bioacoustics, 279
- McDonald M. A., 2004, DIFAR hydrophones applied to whale research, Canadian Acoustics, 32, 155
- Mellinger D. K.&Barlow J. P.(2003).Future directions for acoustic marine mammal surveys: stock assessment and habitat use. Report of a Workshop held in La Jolla CA 20– 22 November 2002. NOAA OAR Special Report NOAA/PMEL Contribution No. 2557. NOAA/PMEL Seattle.
- Wentz G. M., 1964, Marine Bio‐Acoustics, 101
- Willcox S., 2009, The Wave Glider, an energy harvesting autonomous surface vessel, Sea Technology, 49, 29
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives
Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro, J. W., & Llusia, D. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy147 · Cited by 756
Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring
Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover‐Kapfer, P., & Jones, K. E. (2018) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13101 · Cited by 753
Applications for deep learning in ecology
Christin, S., Hervet, É., & Lecomte, N. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13256 · Cited by 724
Adavanne, S., Politis, A., Nikunen, J., & Virtanen, T. I. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2018.2885636 · Cited by 542
Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification
Aide, T. M., Corrada-Bravo, C., Campos-Cerqueira, M., Milan, C., Vega, G., & Alvarez, R. (2013) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.103 · Cited by 487
Metadata
- Authors
- Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific (US)
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Naval Undersea Warfare Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marques, Tiago A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-29
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-309
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- PMC
- PMC3743169
- OpenAlex
- W1587644769
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council (SMRU 10001, NE/J020176/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- animal density estimation, passive acoustic monitoring, acoustic surveys, distance sampling, spatial capture-recapture, hydrophone, marine mammals, vocalization rate, group size, survey design, wildlife management
- MeSH terms
- Acoustics, Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Models, Biological, Population Density, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review