Cited by 487Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationMusic and Audio Processing

Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification

Open access
Aide, T. Mitchell, Corrada-Bravo, Carlos, Campos-Cerqueira, Marconi, Milan, Carlos, Vega, Giovany, Alvarez, Rafael·2013·PeerJ

Abstract

Traditionally, animal species diversity and abundance is assessed using a variety of methods that are generally costly, limited in space and time, and most importantly, they rarely include a permanent record. Given the urgency of climate change and the loss of habitat, it is vital that we use new technologies to improve and expand global biodiversity monitoring to thousands of sites around the world. In this article, we describe the acoustical component of the Automated Remote Biodiversity Monitoring Network (ARBIMON), a novel combination of hardware and software for automating data acquisition, data management, and species identification based on audio recordings. The major components of the cyberinfrastructure include: a solar powered remote monitoring station that sends 1-min recordings every 10 min to a base station, which relays the recordings in real-time to the project server, where the recordings are processed and uploaded to the project website (arbimon.net). Along with a module for viewing, listening, and annotating recordings, the website includes a species identification interface to help users create machine learning algorithms to automate species identification. To demonstrate the system we present data on the vocal activity patterns of birds, frogs, insects, and mammals from Puerto Rico and Costa Rica.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7717/peerj.103

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cloud-based platforms such as EcoSounds-web and ARBIMON, together with annotation-focused tools like Whombat, enable collaborative annotation, archiving, and querying of large acoustic datasets.

    “Cloud-based platforms such as EcoSounds-web and ARBIMON, together with annotation-focused tools like Whombat, enable collaborative annotation, archiving, and querying of large acoustic datasets”
  • Cloud-linked monitoring systems beam recordings from the field to centralized servers; platforms like ARBIMON transmit recordings every few minutes, allowing near real-time species identification and event detection.

    “Platforms like ARBIMON transmit recordings every few minutes, allowing near real-time species identification and event detection”
  • By streaming sound and processing it locally with edge AI, real-time monitoring systems alert rangers to gunshots, chainsaws, or endangered species calls within minutes, enabling rapid intervention.

    “By streaming sound and processing it locally with edge AI, these systems alert rangers to gunshots, chainsaws, or endangered species calls within minutes, enabling rapid intervention (Aide et al. 2013; Wrege et al. 2017).”
  • Real-time monitoring networks are no longer just experimental; they are beginning to reshape conservation practice.

    “Real-time monitoring networks (see Sect. 3.1) are no longer just experimental—they are beginning to reshape conservation practice.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aide, T. M., Corrada-Bravo, C., Campos-Cerqueira, M., Milan, C., Vega, G., & Alvarez, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR)
  • Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico, United States
Corresponding author
Aide, T. Mitchell
Venue
PeerJ
Publisher
PeerJ
Published
2013-07-16
Volume
1
Pages
e103
ISSN
2167-8359 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072814159
Cited by
487
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
14.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PeerJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
Keywords
automated species identification, acoustic remote sensing, real-time data transmission, bird vocalizations, frog vocalization, insect sounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review