Cited by 144Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactClimate change impacts on agriculture

Relationships among multiple aspects of agriculture's environmental impact and productivity: a meta‐analysis to guide sustainable agriculture

German, Richard N., Thompson, Catherine E., Benton, Tim G.·2017·Biological Reviews

Abstract

Given the pressures on land to produce ever more food, doing it ‘sustainably’ is growing in importance. However, ‘sustainable agriculture’ is complex to define, not least because agriculture impacts in many different ways and it is not clear how different aspects of sustainability may be in synergy or trade off against each other. We conducted a meta‐analysis to assess the relationships between multiple measures of sustainability using novel analytical methods, based around defining the efficiency frontier in the relationship between variables, as well as using correlation analysis. We define 20 grouped variables of agriculture's impact (e.g. on soil, greenhouse gas, water, biodiversity) and find evidence of both strong positive and negative correlations between them. Analysis based on the efficiency frontier suggests that trade‐offs can be ‘softened’ by exploiting the natural between‐study variation that arises from a combination of farming best practice and context. Nonetheless, the literature provides strong evidence of the relationship between yields and the negative externalities created by farming across a range of measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/brv.12251

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DiverIMPACTS framework was developed considering the complementarities found in the study by Sabourin [42] and German et al. [43], and additional indicators were integrated to cover SAFA-FAO themes and sub-themes relevant to crop diversification and actor needs.

    “The DiverIMPACTS framework was developed considering the complementarities found in this study. However, additional indicators were integrated to cover SAFA-FAO themes and sub-themes considered relevant by the scientific community to assess crop diversification (i.e., EcosDiv, CropDiv, GenDiv) and to better respond to actor needs (i.e., LocVal; ProdQ).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
German, R. N., Thompson, C. E., & Benton, T. G.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
German, Richard N.
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-05
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
716-738
ISSN
  • 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
OpenAlex
W2253955340
Cited by
144
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J005851/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
sustainable agriculture, environmental impact of agriculture, agricultural productivity, efficient frontier, greenhouse gas emissions, soil quality, water consumption, biodiversity
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environment, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review