The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges
Abstract
A major global effort to enable cost‐effective natural regeneration is needed to achieve ambitious forest and landscape restoration goals. Natural forest regeneration can potentially play a major role in large‐scale landscape restoration in tropical regions. Here, we focus on the conditions that favor natural regeneration within tropical forest landscapes. We illustrate cases where large‐scale natural regeneration followed forest clearing and non‐forest land use, and describe the social and ecological factors that drove these local forest transitions. The self‐organizing processes that create naturally regenerating forests and natural regeneration in planted forests promote local genetic adaptation, foster native species with known traditional uses, create spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and sustain local biodiversity and biotic interactions. These features confer greater ecosystem resilience in the face of future shocks and disturbances. We discuss economic, social, and legal issues that challenge natural regeneration in tropical landscapes. We conclude by suggesting ways to enable natural regeneration to become an effective tool for implementing large‐scale forest and landscape restoration. Major research and policy priorities include: identifying and modeling the ecological and economic conditions where natural regeneration is a viable and favorable land‐use option, developing monitoring protocols for natural regeneration that can be carried out by local communities, and developing enabling incentives, governance structures, and regulatory conditions that promote the stewardship of naturally regenerating forests. Aligning restoration goals and practices with natural regeneration can achieve the best possible outcome for achieving multiple social and environmental benefits at minimal cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A., Phillips, O. L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S. L., Canadell, J. G., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201609 · Cited by 8,458
Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity
Gibson, L., Lee, T. M., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W., Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., Peres, C. A., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10425 · Cited by 2,147
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests
Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., Boukili, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Broadbent, E. N., Chazdon, R. L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16512 · Cited by 1,210
Self-citationSoares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133
Lugo, A. E. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937169 · Cited by 361 · cited 1×
“Although rates of accumulation of aboveground biomass are initially higher in tree plantations than in naturally regenerating sites (Holl & Zahawi 2014), these differences tend to diminish within 20–40 yr (Jordan & Farnworth 1982, Lugo 1992, Bonner et al. 2013, Shoo et al. 2016).”
BackgroundIntegrating plant- and animal-based perspectives for more effective restoration of biodiversity
McAlpine, C., Catterall, C. P., Nally, R. M., Lindenmayer, D., Reid, J. L., Holl, K. D., Bennett, A. F., Runting, R. K., Wilson, K., Hobbs, R. J., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/16-0108.1 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A., & Koch, A. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01026-8 · Cited by 946
Natural regeneration in the context of large‐scale forest and landscape restoration in the tropics
Chazdon, R. L., & Uriarte, M. (2016) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12409 · Cited by 202
Self-citationSchmidt, M. V. C., Ikpeng, Y. U., Kayabi, T., Sanches, R. A., Ono, K. Y., & Adams, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2021.605925 · Cited by 67
Old-growth forest loss and secondary forest recovery across Amazonian countries
Smith, C. C., Healey, J. R., Berenguer, E., Young, P. J., Taylor, B., Elias, F., Espírito-Santo, F., & Barlow, J. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1701 · Cited by 67
Romijn, E., Coppus, R., De Sy, V., Herold, M., Roman-Cuesta, R. M., & Verchot, L. (2019) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f10060510 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Chazdon, R. L., & Guariguata, M. R.
- Venue
- Biotropica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 716-730
- ISSN
- 0006-3606 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7429
- OpenAlex
- W2553094794
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 30.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/btp.12381
- The paper
- Chazdon, R. L., & Guariguata, M. R. (2016). Natural regeneration as a tool for large‐scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.