Cited by 1,133Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyEnvironmental Conservation and Management

Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code

Soares-Filho, Britaldo, Rajão, Raoni, Macedo, Marcia, Carneiro, Arnaldo, Costa, William, Coe, Michael, Rodrigues, Hermann, Alencar, Ane·2014·Science

Abstract

Brazil's controversial new Forest Code grants amnesty to illegal deforesters, but creates new mechanisms for forest conservation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1246663

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The plateau in deforestation rates could be exacerbated by the political instability caused by the Presidential impeachment process and the revision of the forest code.

    “which could be exacerbated by the political instability caused by Presidential impeachment process (Rodrigues-Filho et al., 2015) and the revision of the forest code (Soares-Filho et al., 2014 andVerburg et al., 2014).”
  • The Brazilian environmental scenario has been dramatically changed due to strong demands for biofuels (alcohol from sugarcane) and for soybean for meat production in the Global North.

    “For example, the Brazilian environmental scenario has been dramatically changed due to strong demands for biofuels (alcohol from sugarcane) and for soybean for the meat production in the Global North.”
  • The Brazilian Forest Code has been gradually weakened to legalize ex post previously illegal deforestations and to permit intensive land use of riparian zones.

    “The Brazilian Forest Code, which was formerly a model for the protection of natural resources, has been gradually weakened to legalize ex post previously illegal deforestations and to permit intensive land use of riparian zones [65].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos da Presidência da República, Brasília, DF 70052-900, Brazil.
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
Corresponding author
Soares-Filho, Britaldo
Venue
Science
Published
2014-04-25
Volume
344
Issue
6182
Pages
363-364
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2068927564
Cited by
1,133
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 30
FWCI
85.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
Keywords
Brazilian Forest Code, illegal deforestation, amnesty, forest conservation, environmental law, deforestation policy
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources, Public Policy, Trees, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review