The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design
Open accessAbstract
Living Labs have received limited attention in the literature despite their diffusion throughout E urope and recent interest from policy makers. This limited attention is linked to the newness of the phenomenon, the high heterogeneity of cases and the consequent lack of definitions and acknowledged frameworks for scholarly analyses. In this work, we argue that the originality of the L iving L ab phenomenon resides in the introduction of a new methodology. Using an analysis of the literature and case studies, we propose a new definition, position this methodology among other design methodologies and highlight its peculiarities. We underline the co‐creative potentialities, the awareness of users and the real‐life settings. Furthermore, our case‐based research allows us to identify four different specifications for this methodology, and therefore four different types of L iving L abs, based on the openness of the user involvement and the adopted platform technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
A resource‐based view of the firm
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207 · Cited by 25,635
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
(2017) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n168 · Cited by 8,276
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Teece, D. (1993) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)90063-n · Cited by 7,242
Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20015 · Cited by 6,487
Cited by
Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective
Ruijer, E. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101612 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Dell'Era, C., & Landoni, P.
- Venue
- Creativity and Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-03-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-154
- ISSN
- 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8691
- OpenAlex
- W1853847069
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 28.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/caim.12061
- The paper
- Dell'Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design. Creativity and Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.