Cited by 625Design Education and PracticeInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentBusiness Strategies and Innovation

Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment

Carlgren, Lisa, Rauth, Ingo, Elmquist, Maria·2016·Creativity and Innovation Management

Abstract

The concept of design thinking (DT) has emerged in management debates as promising innovation inspired by the way designers work. Despite the growing interest in DT, it is a difficult concept to study due to the lack of coherence between what DT ‘is’ in academic and practical terms. While there are numerous normative and often process‐focused depictions of DT, they seem limited in their ability to account for what occurs in practice. Given the discussion of DT as a concept, and emerging discussion of its enactment, a framing is needed that acknowledges both aspects. This paper proposes a framing of DT that makes it researchable in both theory and practice, and discusses commonalities and discrepancies in how the concept is usually portrayed in the literature. The paper builds on an empirical interview study in six large organizations, which led to the development of a framework structure and the identification of five themes characterizing DT: User focus, Problem framing, Visualization, Experimentation and Diversity. Each theme is associated with specific principles/mindsets, practices and techniques. The main contribution of this paper is to propose a framework that includes DT both as an idea and as the enactment of the idea, inspired by the works of Latour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/caim.12153

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M.
Affiliations
Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Elmquist, Maria
Venue
Creativity and Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
38-57
ISSN
  • 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8691
OpenAlex
W2192248283
Cited by
625
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
24.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Creativity and Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität St. Gallen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
design thinking, innovation management, organizational innovation, user focus, problem framing, visualization, experimentation, diversity, Bruno Latour

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review