Cited by 14Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyLiteracy, Media, and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Debate: Social media in children and young people – time for a ban? Beyond the ban – empowering parents and schools to keep adolescents safe on social media

Open access
Champion, Katrina E., Birrell, Louise, Smout, Scarlett, Teesson, Maree, Slade, Tim·2025·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

In this article, we examine Australia's landmark decision to ban social media access for children under the age of 16, set to take effect in December 2025. While the legislation aims to protect young people from the harms of social media, including its impact on mental health and wellbeing, the evidence base underpinning the ban remains inconclusive, with most studies unable to establish causality. Drawing on parallels with adolescent alcohol prevention, we argue that prohibition alone is unlikely to be effective. Instead, we advocate for a harm minimisation approach that equips young people with digital literacy, resilience, and help‐seeking skills. We highlight the essential roles of parents, schools, and adolescents in fostering safer social media use and call for inclusive, co‐designed education initiatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/camh.70032

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Champion, K. E., Birrell, L., Smout, S., Teesson, M., & Slade, T.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Champion, Katrina E.
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-09-10
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
411-413
ISSN
  • 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3588
OpenAlex
W4414138193
Cited by
14
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 2
FWCI
24.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
social media ban, children under 16, adolescent mental health, harm reduction, digital literacy, resilience, parental involvement, school education, social media safety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Australia, Child, Humans, Parents, Schools, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review