Cited by 61Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Evaluating and Approaching a Strange Animal: Children's Trust in Informant Testimony

Open access
Boseovski, Janet J, Thurman, Sabrina L·2014·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined 3- to 7-year-old children's reliance on informant testimony to learn about a novel animal. Sixty participants were given positive or negative information about an Australian marsupial from an informant described as a maternal figure or a zookeeper. Children were asked which informant was correct and were invited to touch the animal, which was a stuffed toy hidden in a crate. Overall, younger children endorsed the zookeeper's testimony about the animal, but touched the animal more readily when the maternal figure provided positive information. Older children endorsed the informant who provided positive information, but showed some sensitivity to zookeeper expertise. Age differences were obtained in the association between participant characteristics and informant selection and animal approach behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12156

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boseovski & Thurman (2014) found preschoolers were more influenced by information given by a maternal figure than the older age group, displaying more avoidance when provided negative information by a maternal figure compared with the zookeeper.

    “They found preschoolers were more in fl uenced by information given by a maternal fi gure than the older age group, displaying more avoidance when provided negative information by a maternal fi gure, compared with the zookeeper.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Harris, P. L. (2007). Trust. Developmental Science, 10, 135-138. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 7687.2007.00575.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boseovski, J. J., & Thurman, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Boseovski, Janet J
Venue
Child Development
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
824-834
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2005365570
Cited by
61
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NICHD (R03HD065931-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
children's trust, informant selection, expertise, mother figure, zookeepers, age differences, social learning
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Animals, Wild, Attitude, Psychology, Child, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Marsupialia, Disclosure, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review