Toddlers learn and flexibly apply multiple possibilities.
Abstract
The ability to consider multiple possibilities forms the basis for a wide variety of human-unique cognitive capacities. When does this skill develop? Previous studies have narrowly focused on children's ability to prepare for incompatible future outcomes. Here, we investigate this capacity in a causal learning context. Adults (N = 109) and 18- to 30-month olds (N = 104) observed evidence that was consistent with two hypotheses, each occupying a different level of abstraction (individual vs. relational causation). Results suggest that adults and toddlers identified multiple candidate causes for an effect, held these possibilities in mind, and flexibly applied the appropriate hypothesis to inform subsequent inferences. These findings challenge previous suggestions that the ability to consider multiple alternatives does not emerge until much later in development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework.
Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31 · Cited by 2,695 · see citing works
How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192788 · Cited by 1,815 · see citing works
Children’s and Apes’ Preparatory Responses to Two Mutually Exclusive Possibilities
Redshaw, J., & Suddendorf, T. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.062 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Learning about causes from people: observational causal learning in 24-month-old infants
Meltzoff, A. N., Waismeyer, A., & Gopnik, A. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027440 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Children’s reasoning about possible outcomes of events in the present and the future
Küçük, E. N., & Kibbe, M. M. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vudfm · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goddu, M. K., Sullivan, J. N., & Walker, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goddu, Mariel K
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-11-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2244-2251
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W3198834821
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The Hellman Fund
- NSFCAREER (#2047581)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- causal learning, toddlers, hypothesis testing, cognitive flexibility, causal inference, cognitive development
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Concept Formation, Humans, Learning, Causality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review