Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-fluoride toothpaste: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in adults

Srinivasan, Murali, Schimmel, Martin, Riesen, Martine, Ilgner, Alexander, Wicht, Michael J., Warncke, Michael, Ellwood, Roger P., Nitschke, Ina, Müller, Frauke, Noack, Michael J.·2014·Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this single – blind, multicenter, parallel, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of a high‐fluoride toothpaste on root caries in adults. Methods: Adult patients (n = 130, ♂ = 74, ♀ = 56; mean age ± SD: 56.9 ± 12.9) from three participating centers, diagnosed with root caries, were randomly allocated into two groups: Test (n = 64, ♂ = 37, ♀ = 27; lesions = 144; mean age: 59.0 ± 12.1; intervention: high‐fluoride toothpaste with 5000 ppm F), and Control (n = 66, ♂ = 37, ♀ = 29; lesions = 160; mean age: 54.8 ± 13.5; intervention: regular‐fluoride toothpaste with 1350 ppm F) groups. Clinical examinations and surface hardness scoring of the carious lesions were performed for each subject at specified time intervals (T0 – at baseline before intervention, T1 – at 3 months and T2 – at 6 months after intervention). Mean surface hardness scores (HS) were calculated for each patient. Statistical analyses comprised of two‐way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons using the B onferroni–D unn correction. Results: At T0, there was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to gender (P = 0.0682, unpaired t‐test), or age (P = 0.9786, chi‐squared test), and for the overall HS (Test group: HS = 3.4 ± 0.61; Control group: HS = 3.4 ± 0.66; P = 0.8757, unpaired t‐test). The anova revealed significantly better HS for the test group than for the control groups (T1: Test group: HS = 2.9 ± 0.67; Control group: HS = 3.1 ± 0.75; T2: T est group: HS = 2.4 ± 0.81; Control group: HS = 2.8 ± 0.79; P < 0.0001). However, the interaction term time‐point*group was not significant. Conclusions: The application of a high‐fluoride containing dentifrice (5000 ppm F) in adults, twice daily, significantly improves the surface hardness of otherwise untreated root caries lesions when compared with the use of regular fluoride containing (1350 ppm F) toothpastes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdoe.12090

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00231.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00104.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Clarkson JE, 1993, A comprehensive summary of fluoride dentifrice caries clinical trials, Am J Dent, 6, S59
  4. 10.1034/j.1601-5037.2003.00001.x · DOI
  5. 10.1177/154405910708600807 · DOI
  6. 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0261 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/00220345960750070401 · DOI
  8. Warren JJ, 1999, A review of fluoride dentifrice related to dental fluorosis, Pediatr Dent, 21, 265
  9. McGrady MG, 2010, Why fluoride?, Dent Update, 37, 595, 10.12968/denu.2010.37.9.595 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF03262681 · DOI
  11. 10.1159/000261354 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/00220345970760110901 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1988.tb00574.x · DOI
  14. Davies GM, 2002, A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of providing free fluoride toothpaste from the age of 12 months on reducing caries in 5–6 year old children, Community Dent Health, 19, 131
  15. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00560.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00118.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00080.x · DOI
  18. 10.1177/00220345970760120701 · DOI
  19. Lynch E, 2000, Effectiveness of two fluoride dentifrices to arrest root carious lesions, Am J Dent, 13, 218
  20. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2007.00200.x · DOI
  21. 10.1177/00220345930720031201 · DOI
  22. 10.1159/000047429 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1177/00220345880670110601 · DOI
  24. 10.1902/jop.1987.58.7.460 · DOI
  25. 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1159/000275573 · DOI
  28. 10.1159/000261600 · DOI
  29. 10.1159/000320364 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1997.tb00866.x · DOI
  31. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806140 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/j.0022-0337.1993.57.12.tb02819.x · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb01139.x · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2001.00095.x · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1991.tb00137.x · DOI
  36. 10.1177/154405910808701019 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/1756-0500-2-147 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00045-3 · DOI
  39. 10.1159/000049113 · DOI
  40. Baysan A, 2004, Effect of ozone on the oral microbiota and clinical severity of primary root caries, Am J Dent, 17, 56
  41. 10.1308/135576106775193897 · DOI
  42. Baysan A, 2007, Clinical reversal of root caries using ozone: 6‐month results, Am J Dent, 20, 203
  43. 10.1007/s00455-004-0013-6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Srinivasan, M., Schimmel, M., Riesen, M., Ilgner, A., Wicht, M. J., Warncke, M., Ellwood, R. P., Nitschke, I., Müller, F., & Noack, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics School of Dental Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
  • Department of Prosthodontics and Materials Science Center for Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
  • Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology Centre of Dental Medicine University of Cologne Cologne Germany
  • Medical Research Department Colgate Palmolive Company Hamburg Germany
  • Colgate Palmolive Dental Health Unit Williams House Manchester Science Park Manchester UK
Venue
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-20
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
333-340
ISSN
  • 0301-5661
  • 1600-0528
Cited by
40
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Colgate-Palmolive Company (n/a)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review