Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Umasunthar, T., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Hodes, M., Turner, P. J., Gore, C., Habibi, P., Warner, J. O., Boyle, R. J.·2013·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Background: Food allergy is a common cause of anaphylaxis, but the incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis is not known. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis for people with food allergy and relate this to other mortality risks in the general population. Methods: We undertook a systematic review and meta‐analysis, using the generic inverse variance method. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies using the Newcastle‐Ottawa assessment scale. We searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS or AMED, between January 1946 and September 2012, and recent conference abstracts. We included registries, databases or cohort studies which described the number of fatal food anaphylaxis cases in a defined population and time period and applied an assumed population prevalence rate of food allergy. Results: We included data from 13 studies describing 240 fatal food anaphylaxis episodes over an estimated 165 million food‐allergic person‐years. Study quality was mixed, and there was high heterogeneity between study results, possibly due to variation in food allergy prevalence and data collection methods. In food‐allergic people, fatal food anaphylaxis has an incidence rate of 1.81 per million person‐years (95%CI 0.94, 3.45; range 0.63, 6.68). In sensitivity analysis with different estimated food allergy prevalence, the incidence varied from 1.35 to 2.71 per million person‐years. At age 0–19, the incidence rate is 3.25 (1.73, 6.10; range 0.94, 15.75; sensitivity analysis 1.18–6.13). The incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in food‐allergic people is lower than accidental death in the general European population. Conclusion: Fatal food anaphylaxis for a food‐allergic person is rarer than accidental death in the general population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cea.12211

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Umasunthar, T., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Hodes, M., Turner, P. J., Gore, C., Habibi, P., Warner, J. O., & Boyle, R. J.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-11-22
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
1333-1341
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2140344612
Cited by
269
References
2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cea.12211
The paper
Umasunthar, T., Leonardi‐Bee, J., Hodes, M., Turner, P. J., Gore, C., Habibi, P., Warner, J. O., & Boyle, R. J. (2013). Incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.