Cited by 60Connective tissue disorders researchGenomics and Rare DiseasesDermatological and Skeletal Disorders

Recognizing the tenascin‐X deficient type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: a cross‐sectional study in 17 patients

Open access
Demirdas, S., Dulfer, E., Robert, L., Kempers, M., van Beek, D., Micha, D., van Engelen, B.G., Hamel, B. +4 more·2017·Clinical Genetics

Abstract

The tenascin‐X (TNX) deficient type Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is similar to the classical type of EDS. Because of the limited awareness among geneticists and the challenge of the molecular analysis of the TNXB gene, the TNX‐deficient type EDS is probably to be under diagnosed. We therefore performed an observational, cross‐sectional study. History and physical examination were performed. Results of serum TNX measurements were collected and mutation analysis was performed by a combination of next‐generation sequencing (NGS), Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Included were 17 patients of 11 families with autosomal recessive inheritance and childhood onset. All patients had hyperextensible skin without atrophic scarring. Hypermobility of the joints was observed in 16 of 17 patients. Deformities of the hands and feet were observed frequently. TNX serum level was tested and absent in 11 patients (seven families). Genetic testing was performed in all families; 12 different mutations were detected, most of which are suspected to lead to non‐sense mRNA mediated decay. In short, patients with the TNX‐deficient type EDS typically have generalized joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and easy bruising. In contrast to the classical type, the inheritance pattern is autosomal recessive and atrophic scarring is absent. Molecular analysis of TNXB in a diagnostic setting is challenging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cge.12853

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demirdas, S., Dulfer, E., Robert, L., Kempers, M., van Beek, D., Micha, D., van Engelen, B. G., Hamel, B., Schalkwijk, J., Loeys, B., Maugeri, A., & Voermans, N. C.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Department of Clinical Genetics, Centre for Connective Tissue Research VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam the Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Dermatology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Voermans, N.C.
Venue
Clinical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-04
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
411-425
ISSN
  • 0009-9163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-0004
OpenAlex
W2516645790
Cited by
60
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Keywords
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, tenascin-X, autosomal recessive inheritance, joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility, easy bruising, atrophic scars, genetic diagnosis, nonsense mutation, underdiagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diagnosis, Differential, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Skin Abnormalities, Tenascin, Young Adult, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review