Cited by 20Connective tissue disorders researchGenomics and Rare DiseasesDermatological and Skeletal Disorders

Hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: A review and a critical appraisal of published genetic research to date

Scicluna, Kirsty, Formosa, Melissa M., Farrugia, Rosienne, Borg, Isabella·2022·Clinical Genetics

Abstract

The Ehlers–Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a collection of rare hereditary connective tissue disorders with heterogeneous phenotypes, usually diagnosed following clinical examination and confirmatory genetic testing. Diagnosis of the commonest subtype, hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome (hEDS), relies solely on a clinical diagnosis since its molecular aetiology remains unknown. We performed an up‐to‐date literature search and selected 11 out of 304 publications according to a set of established criteria. Studies reporting variants affecting collagen proteins were found to be hindered by cohort misclassification and subsequent lack of reproducibility of these genetic findings. The role of the described variants affecting Tenascin‐X and LZTS1 is yet to be demonstrated in the majority of hEDS cases, while the functional implication of associated signaling pathways and genes requires further elucidation. The available literature on the genetics of hEDS is scant, dispersed and conflicting due to out‐dated nosology terminology. Recent literature has suggested the role of several promising candidate mechanisms which may be linked to the underlying molecular aetiology. Knowledge of the molecular genetic basis of hEDS is expected to increase in the near future through the mainstream use of high‐throughput sequencing combined with the updated classification of EDS, and the upcoming Hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos Genetic Evaluation (HEDGE) study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cge.14026

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scicluna, K., Formosa, M. M., Farrugia, R., & Borg, I.
Affiliations
University of Malta (MT)
Corresponding author
Borg, Isabella
Venue
Clinical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-14
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
20-31
ISSN
  • 0009-9163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-0004
OpenAlex
W3181608394
Cited by
20
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Keywords
hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, connective tissue diseases, genetic aetiology, tenascin-X, candidate genes, signaling pathways, next-generation sequencing
MeSH terms
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Humans, Disease Management, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Biomedical Research, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review