The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain‐selective mild hypothermia promotes long‐term white matter integrity after ischemic stroke in mice
Abstract
Summary: Introduction: The neuroprotective effects of hypothermia in acute ischemic stroke are well documented. However, the mechanisms involved in the effects remain to be clearly elucidated and the role of hypothermia on long‐term white matter integrity after acute ischemic stroke has yet to be investigated. Aims: To investigate the role of mild focal hypothermia on long‐term white matter (WM) integrity after transient cerebral ischemia. Results: Mild focal hypothermia treatment immediately after ischemic stroke significantly promotes WM integrity 28 days after the occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) in mice. Higher integrity of white matter, lower activation of total microglia, less infarct volume, and better neurobehavioral function were detected in hypothermia‐treated mice compared to normothermia‐treated mice. Furthermore, we found that hypothermia could decrease detrimental M1 phenotype microglia and promote healthy M2 phenotype microglia. In vitro, results also indicated that hypothermia promoted oligodendrocytes differentiation and maturation after oxygen glucose deprivation. Conclusion: Hypothermia promotes long‐term WM integrity and inhibits neuroinflammation in a mouse model of ischemic brain injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“oligodendrocytes, which provide support and envelope the axons of neurons by forming myelin, are particularly susceptible to ischemic insults and could crucially impact the restoration of neurobehavioral functions post-IS [47, 48].”
From M2 microglia-derived small extracellular vesicles modulate NSC fate after ischemic stroke via miR-25-3p/miR-93-5p-TGFBR/PTEN/FOXO3 axis (2025) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
M2 microglia and macrophages drive oligodendrocyte differentiation during CNS remyelination
Miron, V. E., Boyd, A., Zhao, J.-W., Yuen, T. J., Ruckh, J. M., Shadrach, J. L., van Wijngaarden, P., Wagers, A. J., Williams, A., Franklin, R. J. M., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3469 · Cited by 1,777
Self-citationMicroglial Activation and Chronic Neurodegeneration
Lull, M. E., & Block, M. L. (2010) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2010.05.014 · Cited by 1,047
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1002/hbm.20402 · DOI
- 10.1177/0271678X15622464 · DOI
- 10.1177/0271678X16635657 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000189748.52500.a7 · DOI
- 10.3174/ajnr.A3395 · DOI
- 10.1159/000049151 · DOI
- 10.2165/00002512-200724070-00002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.09.003 · DOI
- 10.4103/2394-8108.164997 · DOI
- 10.1177/0271678X16688704 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.904 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65041704.x · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.1996.13.1 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000091269.67384.E7 · DOI
- 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.25 · DOI
- 10.1155/2013/436263 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep25178 · DOI
- 10.1159/000346324 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004647-200001000-00015 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1006953023845 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.03.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep09621 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13311-012-0157-2 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4043-13.2014 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659656 · DOI
- 10.1002/glia.20307 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.017 · DOI
- 10.1111/cns.12263 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.070 · DOI
- 10.3389/fncel.2013.00201 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002210100715 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1501441112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.146 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4103/2394-8108.192517 · DOI
- 10.1177/0271678X16680003 · DOI
- 10.1111/cns.12683 · DOI
- 10.2174/157488909788452997 · DOI
- 10.1111/cns.12823 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5360-06.2007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nn1997 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4103/2394-8108.192516 · DOI
- 10.1177/0271678X16679671 · DOI
- 10.1111/cns.12665 · DOI
- 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b0511e · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, Q., Yi, Y., Chen, T., Ai, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, G., Tang, Z., Chen, J., Xu, T., Chen, X., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03390-2 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., Liu, X., Zhao, J., Yan, F., Wang, R., Wen, S., Wang, L., Luo, Y., & Ji, X.
- Affiliations
- Cerebrovascular Disease Research Institute, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
- Stroke Center Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Beijing China
- ORCID
- Ji, Xun‐Ming
- Venue
- CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1275-1285
- ISSN
- 1755-5930
- 1755-5949
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (81471209, 81641055)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review