Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain‐selective mild hypothermia promotes long‐term white matter integrity after ischemic stroke in mice

Liu, Li‐Qiang, Liu, Xiang‐Rong, Zhao, Jing‐Yan, Yan, Feng, Wang, Rong‐Liang, Wen, Shao‐Hong, Wang, Lei, Luo, Yu‐Min, Ji, Xun‐Ming·2018·CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Introduction: The neuroprotective effects of hypothermia in acute ischemic stroke are well documented. However, the mechanisms involved in the effects remain to be clearly elucidated and the role of hypothermia on long‐term white matter integrity after acute ischemic stroke has yet to be investigated. Aims: To investigate the role of mild focal hypothermia on long‐term white matter (WM) integrity after transient cerebral ischemia. Results: Mild focal hypothermia treatment immediately after ischemic stroke significantly promotes WM integrity 28 days after the occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) in mice. Higher integrity of white matter, lower activation of total microglia, less infarct volume, and better neurobehavioral function were detected in hypothermia‐treated mice compared to normothermia‐treated mice. Furthermore, we found that hypothermia could decrease detrimental M1 phenotype microglia and promote healthy M2 phenotype microglia. In vitro, results also indicated that hypothermia promoted oligodendrocytes differentiation and maturation after oxygen glucose deprivation. Conclusion: Hypothermia promotes long‐term WM integrity and inhibits neuroinflammation in a mouse model of ischemic brain injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cns.13061

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1002/hbm.20402 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0271678X15622464 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/0271678X16635657 · DOI
  4. 10.1161/01.STR.0000189748.52500.a7 · DOI
  5. 10.3174/ajnr.A3395 · DOI
  6. 10.1159/000049151 · DOI
  7. 10.2165/00002512-200724070-00002 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.09.003 · DOI
  9. 10.4103/2394-8108.164997 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0271678X16688704 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.904 · DOI
  12. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65041704.x · DOI
  13. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.1 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/01.STR.0000091269.67384.E7 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.25 · DOI
  16. 10.1155/2013/436263 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/srep25178 · DOI
  18. 10.1159/000346324 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/00004647-200001000-00015 · DOI
  20. 10.1023/A:1006953023845 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.03.015 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/srep09621 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.09.006 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s13311-012-0157-2 · DOI
  25. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4043-13.2014 · DOI
  26. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659656 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/glia.20307 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.026 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.04.005 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.03.021 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.017 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/cns.12263 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.070 · DOI
  34. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00201 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s002210100715 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1501441112 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.146 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.4103/2394-8108.192517 · DOI
  39. 10.1177/0271678X16680003 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/cns.12683 · DOI
  41. 10.2174/157488909788452997 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/cns.12823 · DOI
  43. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5360-06.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nn1997 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.4103/2394-8108.192516 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/0271678X16679671 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/cns.12665 · DOI
  48. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b0511e · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Liu, L., Liu, X., Zhao, J., Yan, F., Wang, R., Wen, S., Wang, L., Luo, Y., & Ji, X.
Affiliations
  • Cerebrovascular Disease Research Institute, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
  • Stroke Center Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders Beijing China
Venue
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-16
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1275-1285
ISSN
  • 1755-5930
  • 1755-5949
Cited by
44
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (81471209, 81641055)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review