Cited by 473Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Microglia/Macrophage Polarization Dynamics in White Matter after Traumatic Brain Injury

Open access
Wang, Guohua, Zhang, Jia, Hu, Xiaoming, Zhang, Lili, Mao, Leilei, Jiang, Xiaoyan, Liou, Anthony Kian-Fong, Leak, Rehana K +2 more·2013·Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Abstract

Mononuclear phagocytes are a population of multi-phenotypic cells and have dual roles in brain destruction/reconstruction. The phenotype-specific roles of microglia/macrophages in traumatic brain injury (TBI) are, however, poorly characterized. In the present study, TBI was induced in mice by a controlled cortical impact (CCI) and animals were killed at 1 to 14 days post injury. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) and immunofluorescence staining for M1 and M2 markers were performed to characterize phenotypic changes of microglia/macrophages in both gray and white matter. We found that the number of M1-like phagocytes increased in cortex, striatum and corpus callosum (CC) during the first week and remained elevated until at least 14 days after TBI. In contrast, M2-like microglia/macrophages peaked at 5 days, but decreased rapidly thereafter. Notably, the severity of white matter injury (WMI), manifested by immunohistochemical staining for neurofilament SMI-32, was strongly correlated with the number of M1-like phagocytes. In vitro experiments using a conditioned medium transfer system confirmed that M1 microglia-conditioned media exacerbated oxygen glucose deprivation–induced oligodendrocyte death. Our results indicate that microglia/macrophages respond dynamically to TBI, experiencing a transient M2 phenotype followed by a shift to the M1 phenotype. The M1 phenotypic shift may propel WMI progression and represents a rational target for TBI treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.146

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the initial week following injury, the microglia population adopts a balanced distribution between pro- and anti-inflammatory states to promote neurogenesis and enhance the immune response to injury.

    “In the initial week following injury, the microglia population adopts a balanced distribution between pro- and anti-inflammatory states to promote neurogenesis and enhance the immune response to injury [89,110,111].”
  • In vitro, conditioned media derived from microglia in an induced pro-inflammatory M1-like state reduces survival of oligodendrocytes, whereas conditioned media from microglia in an induced anti-inflammatory M2-like state promotes remyelination.

    “In vitro, conditioned media derived from microglia in an induced pro-inflammatory ‘M1-like’ state reduces survival of oligodendrocytes in vitro, whereas conditioned media from microglia in an induced anti-inflammatory ‘M2-like’ state promotes remyelination [111,113].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G., Zhang, J., Hu, X., Zhang, L., Mao, L., Jiang, X., Liou, A. K.-F., Leak, R. K., Gao, Y., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Duquesne University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gao, Yanqin
  • Chen, Jun
Venue
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
Published
2013-08-14
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
1864-1874
ISSN
  • 0271-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-7016
OpenAlex
W2041363468
Cited by
473
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 16
FWCI
22.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 45048, NS43802, R01NS062157, NS 36736, R01NS045048, R01NS043802, R01NS036736)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, microglial polarization, macrophage polarization, M1 macrophage phenotype, M2 phenotype, white matter injury, corpus callosum, oligodendrocyte death, oxygen-glucose deprivation, conditioned medium, controlled cortical impact, mononuclear phagocytes
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Injuries, Cells, Cultured, Glucose, Macrophages, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Oxygen, Phagocytosis, RNA, Messenger, Microglia, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review