Cited by 16Marine and coastal plant biologyCoastal wetland ecosystem dynamicsMarine Biology and Ecology Research

Effects of surrounding land use and water depth on seagrass dynamics relative to a catastrophic algal bloom.

Breininger, David R., Breininger, Robert D., Hall, Carlton R.·2017·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Seagrasses are the foundation of many coastal ecosystems and are in global decline because of anthropogenic impacts. For the Indian River Lagoon (Florida, U.S.A.), we developed competing multistate statistical models to quantify how environmental factors (surrounding land use, water depth, and time [year]) influenced the variability of seagrass state dynamics from 2003 to 2014 while accounting for time-specific detection probabilities that quantified our ability to determine seagrass state at particular locations and times. We classified seagrass states (presence or absence) at 764 points with geographic information system maps for years when seagrass maps were available and with aerial photographs when seagrass maps were not available. We used 4 categories (all conservation, mostly conservation, mostly urban, urban) to describe surrounding land use within sections of lagoonal waters, usually demarcated by land features that constricted these waters. The best models predicted that surrounding land use, depth, and year would affect transition and detection probabilities. Sections of the lagoon bordered by urban areas had the least stable seagrass beds and lowest detection probabilities, especially after a catastrophic seagrass die-off linked to an algal bloom. Sections of the lagoon bordered by conservation lands had the most stable seagrass beds, which supports watershed conservation efforts. Our results show that a multistate approach can empirically estimate state-transitio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cobi.12791

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Breininger, D. R., Breininger, R. D., & Hall, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Kennedy Space Center (US)
  • Florida Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Breininger, David R.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-07
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
67-75
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2466619368
Cited by
16
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Keywords
seagrass dynamics, land use, water depth, algal blooms, seagrass die-off, Indian River Lagoon, multi-state models, state transition probabilities, detection probability, urbanization, watershed protection, seagrass mapping, lagoons
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Eutrophication, Florida, Water, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review