The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pelvic pain is a common prolapse symptom and improvement after ventral mesh rectopexy is more frequent than deterioration or de novo pain
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this work was to assess the relationship between pelvic pain and rectal prolapse both before prolapse surgery and in the long term after ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR). METHOD: Patients undergoing VMR between 2004 and 2017 were contacted. Outcomes including the severity of pelvic pain were recorded using a numeric rating scale. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy eight of the 749 patients (64%) were successfully contacted. Of these, 39% reported pre-existing pelvic pain prior to VMR (group A) and 61% were pain free (group B). The median follow-up time was 8.0 years (interquartile range 5.0-10.0 years). Symptoms of obstructed defaecation were significantly more common (p = 0.002) in group A (91/187, 49%) than in group B (101/291, 35%). In contrast, faecal incontinence was more common (p = 0.007) in group B (75/291, 26%) than in group A (29/187, 15%). In group A, 76% showed improvement in pelvic pain after VMR: 61% were pain free and 39% had partial improvement in their pre-existing pelvic pain. Patients with persistent pelvic pain were younger (p = 0.01) and more likely to have revisional surgery after VMR (p = 0.0003), but there was no relation to the indication for surgery (p = 0.59). In group B, 15% reported de novo pelvic pain after VMR, and this was more common in women under 50 years old (p = 0.001), when obstructed defaecation was the indication (p = 0.03), in mesh erosion (p = <0.05) and when associated with revisional surgery (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Pelvic pain is common (39%) in patients undergoing prolapse surgery, and VMR improves this pain in most patients (76%). However, a significant number of patients fail to improve (12%), experience worsening of pain (12%) or develop de novo pelvic pain (15%).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention
Kehlet, H., Jensen, T. S., & Woolf, C. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68700-x · Cited by 4,086
Latthe, P. M., Latthe, M., Say, L., Gülmezoglu, M., & Khan, K. S. (2006) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-177 · Cited by 764
Chronic postsurgical pain in Europe: An observational study
Fletcher, D., Stamer, U. M., Pogatzki-Zahn, E., Zaslansky, R., Tanase, N. V., Perruchoud, C., Kranke, P., Komann, M., Lehman, T., & Meissner, W. (2015) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000000319 · Cited by 599
Lautenbacher, S., Peters, J. H., Heesen, M., Scheel, J., & Kunz, M. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.039 · Cited by 536
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse
D’Hoore, A. J. L., Cadoni, R., & PENNINCKX, F. M. (2004) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4779 · Cited by 527
Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain Among Women: An Updated Review
Ahangari, A. (2014) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2014/17/e141 · Cited by 437
Cerveró, F., & Laird, J. M. A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01306-9 · Cited by 433
Yang, M. M. H., Hartley, R. L., Leung, A. A., Ronksley, P. E., Jetté, N., Casha, S., & Riva-Cambrin, J. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025091 · Cited by 414
Persistent postsurgical pain in a general population: Prevalence and predictors in the Tromsø study
Johansen, A., Romundstad, L. G., Nielsen, C. S., Schirmer, H., & Stubhaug, A. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.018 · Cited by 326
Risk Factors for Chronic Pain after Hysterectomy
Brandsborg, B., Nikolajsen, L., Hansen, C. T., Kehlet, H., & Jensen, T. S. (2007) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000265161.39932.e8 · Cited by 245
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ellington DR, 2013, Pelvic floor symptoms and quality of life analyses in women undergoing surgery for rectal prolapse, World J Colorectal Surg., 3, 3
- CumberlegeJ.First do no harm: the report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review;2020. Accessed July 8 2020.https://www.immdsreview.org.uk/Report.html
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ventral Rectopexy: An International Expert Panel Consensus and Review of Contemporary Literature
Perry, W., Christensen, P., Collinson, R. J., Cornish, J. A., D’Hoore, A., Gurland, B., Mellgren, A. F., Ratto, C., Ris, F., Stevenson, A. R. L., et al. (2025) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000003656 · Cited by 22
Lonne, M. L. R., Cao, A. M. Y., Jenkin, A., Convie, L. J., Stevenson, G., Moloney, J. M., & Stevenson, A. R. L. (2025) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000003661 · Cited by 8
Lamberti, G., Giraudo, D., Ciardi, G., & Levis, J. K. (2026) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm15031116 · Cited by 2
“Chronic or new pelvic pain develops in 2.5–17% of cases, especially after mesh-based repairs or sacrospinous fixation [13,16,20,21].”
InfluentialOperations for Rectal Prolapse
Shearer, J., Gurland, B., & Bungo, C. P. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66772-5_22
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, S., Bolckmans, R., Ratnatunga, K., Gorissen, K., Jones, O., Lindsey, I., & Cunningham, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Sandeep
- ORCID
- Venue
- Colorectal Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-09-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118-127
- ISSN
- 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1318
- OpenAlex
- W4294146904
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Colorectal Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- pelvic pain, rectal prolapse, ventral mesh rectopexy, obstructed defecation, fecal incontinence, mesh erosion, revisional surgery, long-term outcomes, pelvic floor dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Laparoscopy, Rectal Prolapse, Rectum, Surgical Mesh, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review