Cited by 440Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMenstrual Health and Disorders

Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain Among Women: An Updated Review

Open access
Ahangari, Alebtekin·2014·Pain Physician

Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP), defined as a noncyclical pain lasting for more than 6 months can lead to lower physical performance and quality of life in women. CPP is a worldwide problem affecting women of all ages. However, health care professionals and researchers, due to its complex nature and the lack of knowledge surrounding the condition, frequently neglect CPP. Subsequently, basic data and knowledge regarding CPP remain incomplete. Objective: To update the review of the worldwide estimation of the CPP prevalence considering the World Health Organization systematic review by Latthe et al in 2006 as point of departure. Study Design: A systematic review of CPP prevalence studies. Method: Electronic search was performed to find related articles through PubMed between 2005 and 2012 based on the PRISMA statement (2009). Results: From 140 studies, only 7 studies were about CPP prevalence. Their study design consisted of 3 cross sectional studies, one population based mailing questionnaire study, one survey study (computer assisted telephone interview), one data analysis by questionnaire, and one prospective community based study. Limitations: Paucity of population based studies in addition to probability of existence of studies at the local level with limited access to worldwide databases, lack of consensus about definition of CPP among researchers and therapists, and non-inclusion of CPP related key words in databases such as PubMed. Conclusion: Based on these articles, prevalence in general ranged between 5.7% and 26.6%. There were many countries and regions without basic data in the field of CPP. This review shows the paucity of studies, especially multidisciplinary researches with multifactorial views on CPP. Multidisciplinary studies would provide more reliable data for estimating the prevalence of CPP and its psycho-socioeconomic burden, as well as finding its etiologies and characteristics. This would be the first step towards better treatment and care for women with CPP. Key words: Chronic pelvic pain, women, epidemiology, prevalence, human, female

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.36076/ppj.2014/17/e141

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Vincent K. Chronic pelvic pain in wom- en. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2009; 85:24-29.
  2. Choung RS, Herrick LM, Locke GR, 3rd, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. Irritable bow- el syndrome and chronic pelvic pain: A population-based study. Journal of Clini- cal Gastroenterology 2010; 44:696-701.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahangari, A.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ahangari, Alebtekin
Venue
Pain Physician
Published
2014-03-14
Volume
2;17
Issue
2;3
Pages
E141-E147
ISSN
  • 1533-3159 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-1149
OpenAlex
W4294233540
Cited by
437
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2
FWCI
18.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Physician (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
chronic pelvic pain, women, prevalence, quality of life, physical performance, multidisciplinary research, socioeconomic burden, pain etiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review