RoboLap cooperative technique for lymphadenectomy in robotic surgery for right‐sided colon cancer—A video vignette
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of combining robotic and laparoscopic techniques in various surgical procedures. These include robotic distal gastrectomy [1], total gastrectomy [2], robotic hepatectomy utilizing a laparoscopic cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator [3, 4], and hysteroscopy using robotic and laparoscopic instruments [5]. However, evidence regarding their effectiveness in colorectal surgery is limited. Video 1 presents the RoboLap cooperative technique (RLT) for ensuring safety when performing lymphadenectomy in robotic ileocaecal resection. This approach employs two surgeons. The first operator (robotic operator) controls the robotic arms and maintains a clear view of the dissection field. The second operator (laparoscopic operator) is positioned next to the patient and performs lymph node dissection using an ultrasonically activated device (USAD; Harmonic 1100). The USAD offers several advantages: (1) precise dissection due to the fine shape of the device tips; (2) effective sealing of lymphatic vessels, resulting in a consistently dry surgical field and minimized risk of postoperative lymphatic leakage; and (3) improved access to the surgical trunk from the lower left abdominal port, which is crucial for right-sided colon cancer. In contrast, the multijoint function of robotic forceps is advantageous in areas where laparoscopic linear forceps struggle due to limitations on tangential movement. Furthermore, the stable view provided by the robot…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hybrid mechanical-electronic systems offer a synergistic advantage over purely mechanical systems, which lack adaptability, and electronic-only approaches prone to hardware limits.
“Compared to purely mechanical systems, which lack adaptability, or electronic-only approaches prone to hardware limits, hybrid systems offer a synergistic advantage, as seen in manufacturing with dual-drive redundancy reducing motor power [41] and surgery with efficient laparoscopic outcomes [31].”
From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability
Urrea, C. (2025) · Actuators · doi:10.3390/act14040177 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yamamoto, T., Fukuda, M., Yakushigawa, T., Okuchi, Y., Taura, K., & Terajima, H.
- Affiliations
- Kitano Hospital (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Yamamoto, Takehito
- Venue
- Colorectal Disease
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-08-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1779-1781
- ISSN
- 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1318
- OpenAlex
- W4401290555
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Colorectal Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K16487)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Keywords
- robotic surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, lymph node dissection, right-sided colon cancer, ileocecal resection, harmonic scalpel, superior mesenteric vein, colorectal surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review