Cited by 77Language Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCategorization, perception, and language

All Together Now: Concurrent Learning of Multiple Structures in an Artificial Language

Open access
Romberg, Alexa R., Saffran, Jenny R.·2013·Cognitive Science

Abstract

Natural languages contain many layers of sequential structure, from the distribution of phonemes within words to the distribution of phrases within utterances. However, most research modeling language acquisition using artificial languages has focused on only one type of distributional structure at a time. In two experiments, we investigated adult learning of an artificial language that contains dependencies between both adjacent and non‐adjacent words. We found that learners rapidly acquired both types of regularities and that the strength of the adjacent statistics influenced learning of both adjacent and non‐adjacent dependencies. Additionally, though accuracy was similar for both types of structure, participants’ knowledge of the deterministic non‐adjacent dependencies was more explicit than their knowledge of the probabilistic adjacent dependencies. The results are discussed in the context of current theories of statistical learning and language acquisition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cogs.12050

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SL task measures the ability to learn adjacent and non-adjacent relationships.

    “We adopted a statistical learning task of Romberg and Saffran (2013, Experiment 1) as a linguistic measure of the ability (i.e., verbal SL) that underlies proceduralization.”

    From Testing the three-stage model of second language skill acquisition (2025) · cites this paper as Romberg and Saffran (2013, Experiment 1)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abla D Katahira K Okanoya K On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008 20 952 964 18211232
  2. Aslin RN Newport EL Statistical learning: From learning items to generalizing rules Current Directions in Psychological Science in press PMC3758750 24000273
  3. Berry DC Broadbent DE Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction British Journal of Psychology 1988 79 251 272
  4. Chemla E Mintz TH Bernal S Christophe A Categorizing words using ‘frequent frames’: what cross-linguistic analyses reveal about distributional acquisition strategies Developmental Science 2009 12 396 406 19371362 PMC2724313
  5. Cleeremans A Destrebecqz A Boyer M Implicit learning: news from the front Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998 2 406 16 21227256
  6. Cleeremans A McClelland JL Learning the structure of event sequences Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1991 120 235 53 1836490
  7. Conway CM Bauernschmidt A Huang SS Pisoni DB Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key Cognition 2010 114 356 371 19922909 PMC2823831
  8. Dienes Z Perner J A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999 22 735 55 11301570
  9. Endress AD Bonatti LL Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream Cognition 2007 105 247 299 17083927
  10. Gómez RL Variability and detection of invariant structure Psychological Science 2002 13 431 436 12219809
  11. Gómez R Maye J The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning Infancy 2005 7 183 206 33430549
  12. Hayes NA Broadbent DE Two modes of learning for interactive tasks Cognition 1988 28 249 276 3359753
  13. Lany J Gómez RL Twelve-month-old infants benefit from prior experience in statistical learning Psychological Science 2008 19 1247 1252 19121132 PMC2967014
  14. Lany J Saffran JR From statistics to meaning: Infants’ acquisition of lexical categories Psychological Science 2010 21 284 91 20424058 PMC3865606
  15. Makuuchi M Bahlmann J Anwander A Friederici AD Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory 2009 106 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 8361 8367 PMC2688876 19416819
  16. Marcus GF Vijayan S Bandi Rao S Vishton PM Rule learning by seven-month-old infants Science 1999 283 77 80 9872745
  17. Maye J Werker JF Gerken LA Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination Cognition 2002 82 B101 B111 11747867
  18. Mintz TH Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language Memory and Cognition 2002 30 678 686 12219885
  19. Mintz TH Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech Cognition 2003 90 91 117 14597271
  20. Mintz TH Hirsh-Pasek K Golinkoff RM Finding the verbs: Distributional cues to categories available to young learners Action meets word: How children learn verbs 2006 New York Oxford University Press 31 63
  21. Misyak JB Christiansen MH Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study Language Learning in press PMC3153750 21833201
  22. Misyak JB Christiansen MH Tomblin JB Sequential expectations: The role of prediction-based learning in language Topics in Cognitive Science 2010 2 138 153 25163627
  23. Newport EL Aslin RN Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies Cognitive Psychology 2004 48 127 162 14732409
  24. Pelucchi B Hay JF Saffran JR Statistical learning in a natural language by 8-month-old infants Child Development 2009 80 674 685 19489896 PMC3883431
  25. Peña M Bonatti LL Nespor M Mehler J Signal-driven computations in speech processing Science 2002 298 604 607 12202684
  26. Petersson KM Folia V Hagoort P What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax Brain & Language 2012 120 83 95 20943261
  27. Perruchet P Pacton S Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006 10 233 8 16616590
  28. Romberg AR Saffran JR Statistical learning and language acquisition Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2010 1 906 914 21666883 PMC3112001
  29. Saffran JR Aslin RN Newport EL Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants Science 1996 274 1926 1928 8943209
  30. Saffran JR Constraints on statistical language learning Journal of Memory and Language 2002 47 172 196
  31. Clair St.MC Monaghan P Christiansen MH Learning grammatical categories from distributional cues: Flexible frames for language acquisition Cognition 2010 116 341 360 20674613
  32. Stumper B Bannard C Lieven E Tomasello M “Frequent frames” in German child-directed speech: A limited cue to grammatical categories Cognitive Science 2011 35 1190 1205 21790746
  33. Turk-Browne NB Scholl BJ Chun MM Johnson MK Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008 21 1934 1945 18823241 PMC2773825
  34. Vuong LC Meyer AS Christiansen MH Carlson L Hölshcer C Shipley T Simultaneous online tracking of adjacent and non-adjacent dependencies in statistical learning 2011 Proceedings of the 33rdConference Annual Cognitive of the Society Science Austin, TX Cognitive Science Society 964 969
  35. Warker JA Dell GS Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006 32 387 398 16569154

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Romberg, Alexa R.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-14
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
1290-1320
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2113062646
Cited by
77
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (P30HD03352)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (P30HD03352)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F31 DC99042, F31DC009940)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD037466, P30HD03352., R01HD037466, P30HD003352, T32HD007475)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
artificial language learning, statistical learning, language acquisition, non-adjacent dependencies, sequential structure, probabilistic dependencies, explicit knowledge, adult language learners
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Language, Language Development, Learning, Male, Psycholinguistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review