The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Multifaceted Role of Self‐Generated Question Asking in Curiosity‐Driven Learning
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Curiosity motivates the search for missing information, driving learning, scientific discovery, and innovation. Yet, identifying that there is a gap in one's knowledge is itself a critical step, and may demand that one formulate a question to precisely express what is missing. Our work captures the integral role of self‐generated questions during the acquisition of new information, which we refer to as active‐curiosity‐driven learning. We tested active‐curiosity‐driven learning using our “Curiosity Question & Answer Task” paradigm, where participants ( N =135) were asked to generate questions in response to novel, incomplete factual statements and provided the opportunity to forage for answers. We also introduce new measures of question quality that express how well questions capture stimulus and foraging information. We hypothesized that active question asking should influence behavior across the stages of our task by increasing the probability that participants express curiosity, forage for answers, and remember what they had thereby discovered. We found that individuals who asked a high number of quality questions experienced elevated curiosity, were more likely to pursue missing information that was semantically related to their questions, and more likely to retain the information on a later cued recall test. Additional analyses revealed that curiosity played a predominant role in motivating participants to forage for missing information, and that both curiosity and satisfaction with the acquired information boosted memory recall. Overall, our results suggest that asking questions enhances the value of missing information, with important implications for learning and discovery of all forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval
Salton, G., & Buckley, C. (1988) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0 · Cited by 9,740
Bayesian model selection in social research
Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271063 · Cited by 6,823
Conflict, arousal, and curiosity.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11164-000 · Cited by 6,018
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702
Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness
Ford, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/414498 · Cited by 4,419
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,363
TESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. II
Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1951) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.159 · Cited by 4,005
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fox J., 2019, An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.)
- 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643 · DOI · Paper page
- RStudio Team, 2020, RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R
Cited by
Shen, M., Shen, Y., Liu, F., & Jin, J. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03115-8 · Cited by 76
Capturing, clarifying, and consolidating the curiosity-creativity connection
Koutstaal, W., Kedrick, K., & Gonzalez-Brito, J. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-19694-4 · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kedrick, K., Schrater, P., & Koutstaal, W.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0364-0213
- 1551-6709
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 60
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Multifaceted Role of Self‐Generated Question Asking in Curiosity‐Driven Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cogs.13253
- The paper
- Kedrick, K., Schrater, P., & Koutstaal, W. (2023). The Multifaceted Role of Self‐Generated Question Asking in Curiosity‐Driven Learning. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.