The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Hashtags to Capture Fine Emotion Categories from Tweets
Abstract
Detecting emotions in microblogs and social media posts has applications for industry, health, and security. Statistical, supervised automatic methods for emotion detection rely on text that is labeled for emotions, but such data are rare and available for only a handful of basic emotions. In this article, we show that emotion‐word hashtags are good manual labels of emotions in tweets. We also propose a method to generate a large lexicon of word–emotion associations from this emotion‐labeled tweet corpus. This is the first lexicon with real‐valued word–emotion association scores. We begin with experiments for six basic emotions and show that the hashtag annotations are consistent and match with the annotations of trained judges. We also show how the extracted tweet corpus and word–emotion associations can be used to improve emotion classification accuracy in a different nontweet domain. Eminent psychologist Robert Plutchik had proposed that emotions have a relationship with personality traits. However, empirical experiments to establish this relationship have been stymied by the lack of comprehensive emotion resources. Because personality may be associated with any of the hundreds of emotions and because our hashtag approach scales easily to a large number of emotions, we extend our corpus by collecting tweets with hashtags pertaining to 585 fine emotions. Then, for the first time, we present experiments to show that fine emotion categories such as those of excitement, guilt, yearning, and admiration are useful in automatically detecting personality from text. Stream‐of‐consciousness essays and collections of Facebook posts marked with personality traits of the author are used as test sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy
Resnik, P. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9511007 · Cited by 3,193
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218772110 · Cited by 2,829
Mbti Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-briggs Type Indicator
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., & Most, R. B. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,783
Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment
Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · Cited by 2,649
CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x · Cited by 2,634
Self-citation
Cited by
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847
Deep Learning-Based Document Modeling for Personality Detection from Text
Majumder, N., Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., & Cambria, E. (2017) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2017.23 · Cited by 675
Dynamics of information diffusion and its applications on complex networks
Zhang, Z.-K., Liu, C., Zhan, X.-X., Lu, X., Zhang, C.-X., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.07.002 · Cited by 484
Mohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391
Self-citationCARER: Contextualized Affect Representations for Emotion Recognition
Saravia, E., Liu, H.-C. T., Huang, Y.-H., Wu, J., & Chen, Y.-S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1404 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohammad, S. M., & Kiritchenko, S.
- Venue
- Computational Intelligence
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-10
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-326
- ISSN
- 0824-7935 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8640
- OpenAlex
- W1569507287
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 27.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Hashtags to Capture Fine Emotion Categories from Tweets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/coin.12024
- The paper
- Mohammad, S. M., & Kiritchenko, S. (2015). Using Hashtags to Capture Fine Emotion Categories from Tweets. Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.