The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony
Abstract
Framing is an important concept in communication, yet many framing studies set out to develop frames relevant to only one issue. We expand framing theory by introducing figurative framing. We posit that figurative language types like metaphor, hyperbole and irony are important in shaping public discourse, because these figures contain important linguistic and conceptual content about the issue under discussion. We first explicate the role of each individual figure (metaphor, hyperbole, and irony) in the framing of important societal issues. Then, we focus on complex figurative frames (combinations of metaphor, hyperbole, and/or irony). The article concludes with a research agenda, connecting figurative framing to the four key processes in framing research (frame building, frame setting, individual-level effects, and feedback loop).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach
Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229213 · Cited by 4,971
Framing as a Theory of Media Effects
Scheufele, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x · Cited by 2,179
Ortony, A. (1979) · Cited by 2,159
Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162548 · Cited by 1,429
On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language
Giora, R. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001 · Cited by 1,335
Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think
Lakoff, G. P. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,265
The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought
(2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816802 · Cited by 1,032
Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects
Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024834831093 · Cited by 927
Cited by
Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis
Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2017.1282813 · Cited by 464
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J.
- Venue
- Communication Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-04-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 410-430
- ISSN
- 1050-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2335859440
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 47.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/comt.12096
- The paper
- Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
