Cited by 13Clinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and EducationMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Evidence‐based protocols: Merits, drawbacks, and potential solutions.

Asnaani, Anu, Gallagher, Thea, Foa, Edna B.·2018·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cpsp.12266

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asnaani, A., Gallagher, T., & Foa, E. B.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2018-12
Volume
25
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W2905575283
Cited by
13
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
evidence-based practice, protocol design, implementation barriers, clinical decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review