Cited by 32Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Beyond the Constraints of an RCT: Naturalistic treatment outcomes for anxiety-related disorders

Open access
Asnaani, Anu, Benhamou, Kathy, Kaczkurkin, Antonia N., Turk-Karan, Elizabeth, Foa, Edna B.·2020·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Despite considerable data from randomized controlled trials supporting use of behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders and anxiety-related disorders, there is a relative scarcity of data demonstrating that such findings are generalizable to patients in nonresearch settings, and a lack of standardized repeated outcome measurement in such settings. Using one of the largest examinations of naturalistic outcomes of behavioral therapies in treatment-seeking patients (N = 489), we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients seeking treatment for anxiety and anxiety-related disorders in the past 3 years. Patients seeking treatment at a clinic specializing in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) completed self-report questionnaires via an electronic data capture system and diagnostic interview at baseline, and were reassessed at mid- and posttreatment. Patients with anxiety and related disorders were assessed for changes in symptom severity and secondary outcomes (impairment/functioning, quality of life, and depression) over the course of therapy. Patients showed clinically significant and statistically reliable improvement in anxiety symptom severity scores over treatment (p < .001), after controlling for number of sessions received. Patients also showed significant improvement in depression, quality of life, and functioning (p values ≤ .001). We also found significant improvement in disorder-specific symptoms, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder (p values ≤ .001). Importance of, and ways to facilitate, integration of more routine assessment of a broader range of symptoms via online assessment systems and methods to better determine the effectiveness of CBT in naturalistic clinics are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2019.07.007

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Craske MG, Barlow DH: Mastery of your anxiety and worry. 2006. Oxford University Press New York, NY

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asnaani, A., Benhamou, K., Kaczkurkin, A. N., Turk-Karan, E., & Foa, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Asnaani, Anu
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
434-446
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966684978
Cited by
32
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment-seeking patients, symptom severity, depression, quality of life, functioning, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, online assessment, routine outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review