Cited by 18Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchPalliative and Oncologic Care

Palliative care understanding and end‐of‐life decisions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Fahim, Ahmed, Kastelik, Jack A.·2014·The Clinical Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of respiratory morbidity and mortality with limited data on palliative care and evidence of reluctance to end‐of‐life discussions. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the understanding of palliative care as an option in COPD. Moreover, we wanted to identify any barriers to resuscitation discussions in this group of patients. Methods: We developed a questionnaire addressing the aims of the study. Patients with COPD were prospectively recruited into the study and completed palliative questionnaire, L eicester cough questionnaire, B org dyspnoea index and Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale. Results: The patient population was predominantly male (60%) with mean age of 70 years (range 43–87 years). The mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 1.0 (range 0.3–2.3 L). The mean body mass index of the cohort was 24.3 (standard deviation 6.7, range 14.5–42). Ten patients (33%) were on home oxygen. Thirteen (43%) patients understood the term non‐invasive ventilation, and 11 of those would consider it again if needed. Only 13% of patients knew that palliative care is an option in COPD. Eleven patients understood the term cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and only five (16%) ever had a discussion regarding resuscitation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there is extremely limited awareness of palliative care in patients with COPD. Moreover, the barriers to the end‐of‐life discussions should be explored to improve the end‐of‐life care in this disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/crj.12073

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients need comprehensive information on living with home mechanical ventilation, tailored to their needs, especially about adverse events.

    “Indeed, they need to receive comprehensive information on living with HMV, tailored to their needs [14–16], especially about adverse events [17].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fahim, A., & Kastelik, J. A.
Affiliations
  • New Cross Hospital (GB)
  • Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Fahim, Ahmed
Venue
The Clinical Respiratory Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-16
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
312-320
ISSN
  • 1752-6981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-699X
OpenAlex
W1598637222
Cited by
18
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Clinical Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, palliative care, end-of-life care, end-of-life discussions, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, patient awareness, non-invasive ventilation, dyspnea, home oxygen therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Decision Making, Dyspnea, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review