Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Declines in insect abundance and diversity: We know enough to act now

Open access
Forister, Matthew L., Pelton, Emma M., Black, Scott H.·2019·Conservation Science and Practice

Abstract

Recent regional reports and trends in biomonitoring suggest that insects are experiencing a multicontinental crisis that is apparent as reductions in abundance, diversity, and biomass. Given the centrality of insects to terrestrial ecosystems and the food chain that supports humans, the importance of addressing these declines cannot be overstated. The scientific community has understandably been focused on establishing the breadth and depth of the phenomenon and on documenting factors causing insect declines. In parallel with ongoing research, it is now time for the development of a policy consensus that will allow for a swift societal response. We point out that this response need not wait for full resolution of the many physiological, behavioral, and demographic aspects of declining insect populations. To these ends, we suggest primary policy goals summarized at scales from nations to farms to homes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/csp2.80

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1073/pnas.1903409116 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1903409116
  2. 10.7717/peerj.11 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.10265-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s10841-007-9099-0 · DOI
  5. Canadian Cancer Society, 2013, Cosmetic pesticides
  6. 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.08.022 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.329.5988.140-a · DOI · Paper page
  8. Crone E. E., 2019, Faster movement in nonhabitat matrix promotes range shifts in heterogeneous landscapes, Ecology, e02701, 10.1002/ecy.2701 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10841-019-00135-z · DOI
  10. 10.1186/s40665-018-0039-x · DOI
  11. Fox R., 2015, The State of the UK's butterflies 2015
  12. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01277.x · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.1255957 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/1365-2664.12134 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/cobi.12840 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.026 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/539141a · DOI
  19. Hopwood J., 2016, Pollinators and roadsides: Best management practices for managers and decision makers
  20. Hopwood J., 2015, Literature review: Pollinator habitat enhancement and best management practices in highway rights‐of‐way
  21. IUCN, 2018, The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018‐1
  22. 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.030 · DOI
  23. 10.1163/18749836-07021077 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00182-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.031 · DOI
  26. Montgomery G. A. Dunn R. Fox R. Jongejans E. Leather S. R. Saunders M. Shortall C. Tingley M. &Wagner D. L.(in review).Is the insect apocalypse upon us? How to find out.
  27. 10.1038/s41598-019-39701-5 · DOI
  28. Nieto A., 2014, European red list of bees, 98
  29. Pelton E. P. Schultz C. B. Jepsen S. J. Black S. H.&Crone E. E.(2019).Western monarch population plummets: Status probable causes and recommended conservation actions. · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00258
  30. 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.4.388 · doi:10.21273/hortsci.51.4.388
  31. Salcido D. M., 2019, Ecosystem services at risk from declining taxonomic and interaction diversity in a tropical forest, bioRxiv, 631028
  32. 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1511/2019.107.3.148 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/oso/9780195125191.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7637 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1111/gcb.14608 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/1365-2664.13012 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/gcb.14008 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09819-0 · DOI
  40. Wagner D. L., 2020, Insect declines in the Anthropocene, Annual Review of Entomology, 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025151 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1126/science.aar3646 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Wepprich T., 2019, Butterfly abundance declines over 20 years of systematic monitoring in Ohio, USA, BioRxiv, 613786
  43. 10.1007/s00442-016-3560-2 · DOI

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Forister, M. L., Pelton, E. M., & Black, S. H.
Venue
Conservation Science and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-22
Volume
1
Issue
8
ISSN
2578-4854 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952242079
Cited by
326
References
6
FWCI
26.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.