Cited by 16Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Cardio‐hepatic risk assessment by CMR imaging in liver transplant candidates

Reddy, Sahadev T., Thai, Ngoc L., Oliva, Jose, Tom, Kusum B., Dishart, Michael K., Doyle, Mark, Yamrozik, June A., Williams, Ronald B. +5 more·2018·Clinical Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The preoperative workup of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients is practically complex given the need for multiple imaging modalities. We recently demonstrated in our proof-of-concept study the value of a one-stop-shop approach using cardiovascular MRI (CMR) to address this complex problem. However, this approach requires further validation in a larger cohort, as detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as cardiovascular risk assessment is critically important in these patients. We hypothesized that coronary risk assessment and HCC detectability is acceptable using the one-stop-shop CMR approach. METHODS: In this observational study, patients underwent CMRI evaluation including cardiac function, stress CMR, thoracoabdominal MRA, and abdominal MRI on a standard MRI scanner in one examination. RESULTS: Over 8 years, 252 OLT candidates underwent evaluation in the cardiac MRI suit. The completion rates for each segment of the CMR examination were 99% for function, 95% completed stress CMR, 93% completed LGE for viability, 85% for liver MRI, and 87% for MRA. A negative CMR stress examination had 100% CAD event-free survival at 12 months. A total of 63 (29%) patients proceeded to OLT. Explant pathology confirmed detection/exclusion of HCC. CONCLUSIONS: This study further defines the population suitable for the one-stop-shop CMR concept for preop evaluation of OLT candidates providing a road map for integrated testing in this complex patient population for evaluation of cardiac risk and detection of HCC lesions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ctr.13229

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddy, S. T., Thai, N. L., Oliva, J., Tom, K. B., Dishart, M. K., Doyle, M., Yamrozik, J. A., Williams, R. B., Shah, M., Wani, A., Singh, A., Maheswary, R., & Biederman, R. W. W.
Affiliations
  • Allegheny General Hospital (US)
  • Gastroenterology Allegheny General Hospital Pittsburgh PA USA
  • Department of Radiology Allegheny General Hospital Pittsburgh PA USA
Corresponding author
Biederman, Robert W.W.
Venue
Clinical Transplantation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
e13229-e13229
ISSN
  • 0902-0063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-0012
OpenAlex
W2805171579
Cited by
16
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
orthotopic liver transplantation, liver transplant candidates, cardiovascular MRI, coronary artery disease, stress cardiac MRI, hepatocellular carcinoma detection, preoperative assessment, cardiac risk assessment, liver MRI
MeSH terms
Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Diseases, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Preoperative Care, Prognosis, Cohort Studies, Liver Transplantation, Liver Failure, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review