Application of a Dynamic Map for Learning, Communicating, Navigating, and Improving Therapeutic Development
Open accessAbstract
Drug discovery and development is commonly schematized as a “pipeline,” and, although appreciated by drug developers to be a useful oversimplification, this cartology may perpetuate inaccurate notions of straightforwardness and is of minimal utility for process engineering to improve efficiency. To create a more granular schema, a group of drug developers, researchers, patient advocates, and regulators developed a crowdsourced atlas of the steps involved in translating basic discoveries into health interventions, annotated with the steps that are particularly prone to difficulty or failure. This Drug Discovery, Development, and Deployment Map (4DM), provides a network view of the process, which will be useful for communication and education to those new to the field, orientation and navigation of individual projects, and prioritization of technology development and re‐engineering endeavors to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The 4DM is freely available for utilization, modification, and further development by stakeholders across the translational ecosystem.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The R&D process is far from the linear pathway commonly described.
“The R&D process itself is recognized as far from the linear pathway commonly described (Fig 1).”
From Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development (2019) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Torres, V. E., Harris, P. C., & Pirson, Y. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60601-1 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Dorsomorphin inhibits BMP signals required for embryogenesis and iron metabolism
Yu, P. B., Hong, C. C., Sachidanandan, C., Babitt, J. L., Deng, D. Y., Hoyng, S. A., Lin, H. Y.-F., Bloch, K. D., & Peterson, R. T. (2007) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2007.54 · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
BMP signalling in skeletal development, disease and repair
Salazar, V. S., Gamer, L. W., & Rosen, V. (2016) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2016.12 · Cited by 848 · see citing works
BMP type I receptor inhibition reduces heterotopic ossification
Yu, P. B., Deng, D. Y., Lai, C. S. C., Hong, C. C., Cuny, G. D., Bouxsein, M., Hong, D. W., McManus, P. M., Katagiri, T., Sachidanandan, C., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.1888 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Structure–activity relationship study of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling inhibitors
Cuny, G. D., Yu, P. B., Laha, J. K., Xing, X., Liu, J.-F., Lai, C. S. C., Deng, D. Y., Sachidanandan, C., Bloch, K. D., & Peterson, R. T. (2008) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.06.052 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
The neuropeptide Y system: Pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in obesity and cancer
Zhang, L., Bijker, M. S., & Herzog, H. (2011) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.03.011 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Erondu, N., Gantz, I., Musser, B. J., Suryawanshi, S., Mallick, M., Addy, C., Côté, J., Bray, G. A., Fujioka, K., Bays, H. E., et al. (2006) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.08.002 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
A guide to drug discovery: Making Better Drugs: Decision Gates in Non-Clinical Drug Development
Pritchard, J. F., Jurima‐Romet, M., Reimer, M. J., Mortimer, E., Rolfe, B., & Cayen, M. (2003) · Nature reviews. Drug discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1131 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Shore, E. M., & Kaplan, F. S. (2008) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.013 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Perrone, R. D., Mouksassi, S., Romero, K., et al. (2017) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2017.01.003 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Dysregulation of the BMP‐4 Signaling Pathway in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
Kaplan, F. S., Fiori, J. L., de la Peña, L. S., et al. (2006) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1346.008 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Kealey, S., Plisson, C., Collier, T. L., et al. (2011) · Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c0ob00631a · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A dynamic map for learning, communicating, navigating and improving therapeutic development
Wagner, J. A., Dahlem, A. M., Hudson, L. D., Terry, S. F., Altman, R. B., Gilliland, C. T., DeFeo, C., & Austin, C. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.217 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationAn End to the Myth: There Is No Drug Development Pipeline
Baxter, K. K., Horn, E. J., Gal‐Edd, N., Zonno, K. D., O'Leary, J. C., Terry, P. F., & Terry, S. F. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003505 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationWelling, P. G., Lasagna, L. C., & Banakar, U. V. (1996) · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Perrone, R. D., Neville, J., Chapman, A. B., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.04.044 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Perrone, R. D., Mouksassi, S., Romero, K., et al. (2017) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.011 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Discovery and evaluation of spirocyclic derivatives as antagonists of the neuropeptide Y5 receptor
Fichtner, M. W., Lee, E.-S., Tomlinson, E., et al. (2012) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.02.098 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organs-on-chips: into the next decade
Low, L. A., Mummery, C., Berridge, B. R., Austin, C. P., & Tagle, D. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0079-3 · Cited by 1,029 · see citing works
Self-citationExploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development
Ekins, S., Puhl, A. C., Zorn, K. M., Lane, T. R., Russo, D. P., Klein, J. J., Hickey, A. J., & Clark, A. M. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0338-z · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet?
Hasselgren, C., & Oprea, T. I. (2024) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-040323-040828 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
“and development; f) regulatory review; g) post-marketing and h) medical practice deployment (2).”
Background
- Authors
- Wagner, J. A., Dahlem, A. M., Hudson, L. D., Terry, S. F., Altman, R. B., Gilliland, C. T., DeFeo, C., & Austin, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co. Cambridge Massachusetts USA
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Critical Path Institute (US)
- Genetic Alliance (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Bethesda Maryland USA
- Corresponding author
- Austin, Christopher P.
- Venue
- Clinical and Translational Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12-22
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 166-174
- ISSN
- 1752-8054 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-8062
- PMC
- PMC5866991
- OpenAlex
- W2779431579
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical and Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
- Keywords
- drug discovery, drug development, treatment development, dynamic maps, translational research, process engineering, network visualization, patient advocacy, regulatory science
- MeSH terms
- Intersectoral Collaboration, Drug Development, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Humans, Learning, Myositis Ossificans, Neuropeptide Y, Obesity, Pyrazoles, Pyrimidines, Research Design, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division, Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant, Biomedical Technology, Drug Discovery, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review