Cited by 45Health and Medical Research ImpactsInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationScience, Research, and Medicine

Application of a Dynamic Map for Learning, Communicating, Navigating, and Improving Therapeutic Development

Open access
Wagner, John A., Dahlem, Andrew M., Hudson, Lynn D., Terry, Sharon F., Altman, Russ B., Gilliland, C. Taylor, DeFeo, Christopher, Austin, Christopher P.·2018·Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract

Drug discovery and development is commonly schematized as a “pipeline,” and, although appreciated by drug developers to be a useful oversimplification, this cartology may perpetuate inaccurate notions of straightforwardness and is of minimal utility for process engineering to improve efficiency. To create a more granular schema, a group of drug developers, researchers, patient advocates, and regulators developed a crowdsourced atlas of the steps involved in translating basic discoveries into health interventions, annotated with the steps that are particularly prone to difficulty or failure. This Drug Discovery, Development, and Deployment Map (4DM), provides a network view of the process, which will be useful for communication and education to those new to the field, orientation and navigation of individual projects, and prioritization of technology development and re‐engineering endeavors to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The 4DM is freely available for utilization, modification, and further development by stakeholders across the translational ecosystem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cts.12531

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, J. A., Dahlem, A. M., Hudson, L. D., Terry, S. F., Altman, R. B., Gilliland, C. T., DeFeo, C., & Austin, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co. Cambridge Massachusetts USA
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Critical Path Institute (US)
  • Genetic Alliance (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Bethesda Maryland USA
Corresponding author
Austin, Christopher P.
Venue
Clinical and Translational Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-22
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
166-174
ISSN
  • 1752-8054 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-8062
OpenAlex
W2779431579
Cited by
45
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
Keywords
drug discovery, drug development, treatment development, dynamic maps, translational research, process engineering, network visualization, patient advocacy, regulatory science
MeSH terms
Intersectoral Collaboration, Drug Development, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Humans, Learning, Myositis Ossificans, Neuropeptide Y, Obesity, Pyrazoles, Pyrimidines, Research Design, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division, Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant, Biomedical Technology, Drug Discovery, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review