The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
See and be seen: Infant–caregiver social looking during locomotor free play
Open accessAbstract
Face‐to‐face interaction between infants and their caregivers is a mainstay of developmental research. However, common laboratory paradigms for studying dyadic interaction oversimplify the act of looking at the partner's face by seating infants and caregivers face to face in stationary positions. In less constrained conditions when both partners are freely mobile, infants and caregivers must move their heads and bodies to look at each other. We hypothesized that face looking and mutual gaze for each member of the dyad would decrease with increased motor costs of looking. To test this hypothesis, 12‐month‐old crawling and walking infants and their parents wore head‐mounted eye trackers to record eye movements of each member of the dyad during locomotor free play in a large toy‐filled playroom. Findings revealed that increased motor costs decreased face looking and mutual gaze: Each partner looked less at the other's face when their own posture or the other's posture required more motor effort to gain visual access to the other's face. Caregivers mirrored infants' posture by spending more time down on the ground when infants were prone, perhaps to facilitate face looking. Infants looked more at toys than at their caregiver's face, but caregivers looked at their infant's face and at toys in equal amounts. Furthermore, infants looked less at toys and faces compared to studies that used stationary tasks, suggesting that the attentional demands differ in an unconstrained locomotor task. Taken together, findings indicate that ever‐changing motor constraints affect real‐life social looking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166214 · Cited by 2,727
The Infant's Response to Entrapment between Contradictory Messages in Face-to-Face Interaction
Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T. B. (1978) · Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0002-7138(09)62273-1 · Cited by 1,880
THE COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGES IN MATCHED SAMPLES
COCHRAN, W. G. (1950) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/37.3-4.256 · Cited by 1,465
Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy204 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Cited by
Motor Development: Embodied, Embedded, Enculturated, and Enabling
Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836 · Cited by 580
Self-citationThe Developing Infant Creates a Curriculum for Statistical Learning
Smith, L. B., Jayaraman, S., Clerkin, E., & Yu, C. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.004 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Franchak, J. M., Kretch, K. S., & Adolph, K. E.
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e12626-e12626
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2766480293
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: See and be seen: Infant–caregiver social looking during locomotor free play. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/desc.12626
- The paper
- Franchak, J. M., Kretch, K. S., & Adolph, K. E. (2018). See and be seen: Infant–caregiver social looking during locomotor free play. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12626
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.