Cited by 580Children's Physical and Motor DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Motor Development: Embodied, Embedded, Enculturated, and Enabling

Open access
Adolph, Karen E., Hoch, Justine E.·2019·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Motor development and psychological development are fundamentally related, but researchers typically consider them separately. In this review, we present four key features of infant motor development and show that motor skill acquisition both requires and reflects basic psychological functions. ( a) Motor development is embodied: Opportunities for action depend on the current status of the body. ( b) Motor development is embedded: Variations in the environment create and constrain possibilities for action. ( c) Motor development is enculturated: Social and cultural influences shape motor behaviors. ( d) Motor development is enabling: New motor skills create new opportunities for exploration and learning that instigate cascades of development across diverse psychological domains. For each of these key features, we show that changes in infants’ bodies, environments, and experiences entail behavioral flexibility and are thus essential to psychology. Moreover, we suggest that motor development is an ideal model system for the study of psychological development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of undertaking autonomous activities-even random as infants' motor babbling-for the development of skilful capabilities has been shown by work in embodied robotics adopting the AIF.

    “The role of undertaking autonomous activities—even random as infants’ ‘motor babbling’ (i.e. the flailing of the limbs [81,82]; see also [83–85])—for the development of skilful capabilities (i.e. goal-directed actions), has been shown by work in embodied robotics adopting the AIF.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Adolph KE, Karasik LB, Tamis-LeMonda CS. 2010b Motor skills. In Handbook of Cultural Development Science, Vol. 1: Domains of Development Across Cultures, ed. Bornstein MH, pp. 61– 88. New York: Taylor and Francis
  2. Adolph KE, Robinson SR. 2015 Motor development In Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 2, ed. L Liben, Muller U, pp. 114– 57. New York: Wiley 7th ed.
  3. Bertenthal BI, Clifton RK. 1998 Perception and action In Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, Perception, and Language, ed. Kuhn D, Siegler RS, pp. 51– 102. New York: Wiley 5th ed.
  4. Bushnell EW, Boudreau JP. 1998 Exploring and exploiting objects with the hands during infancy In The Psychobiology of the Hand: Clinics in Developmental Medicine, ed. Connolly KJ, pp. 144– 61. London: MacKeith Press
  5. Oster H 2005 The repertoire of infant facial expressions: an ontogenetic perspective In Emotional Development: Recent Research Advances, ed. Nadel J, Muir D, pp. 261– 92. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Shapiro L 2011 Embodied Cognition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2019-01-04
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
141-164
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2892734197
Cited by
580
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 9
FWCI
6.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • LEGO Foundation
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD086034, R37HD033486, R01HD033486)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
infant motor development, motor skill learning, embodiment, embeddedness, enculturation, behavioral flexibility, psychological development, developmental cascades
MeSH terms
Child Development, Culture, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Infant, Learning, Motor Activity, Motor Skills, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review