Cited by 67Child Welfare and AdoptionLanguage Development and DisordersEarly Childhood Education and Development

Enhancing the language development of toddlers in foster care by promoting foster parents’ sensitivity: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Raby, Kenneth Lee, Freedman, Emily, Yarger, Heather A., Lind, Teresa, Dozier, Mary·2019·Developmental Science

Abstract

Young children in foster care are at increased risk for problematic language development, making early intervention a critical tool in enhancing these children's foundational language abilities. This study examined the efficacy of an early preventative intervention, Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up for Toddlers (ABC-T), in improving the receptive vocabulary abilities of toddlers placed in foster care. All the children had been removed from their biological parents' care and placed into foster care. When children were between 24 and 36 months old, foster parents were contacted by research staff and consented to participate. Parents were randomly assigned using a random number generator to receive either ABC-T (n = 45), which aimed to promote sensitive parenting for children who have experienced early adversity, or a control intervention (n = 43). Foster children's receptive vocabulary skills were assessed post-intervention using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Third Edition, when children were between 36 and 60 months old. Children whose foster parents received ABC-T demonstrated more advanced receptive vocabulary abilities than children whose foster parents received the control intervention. The positive effect of ABC-T on foster children's receptive vocabulary was mediated by increases in foster parents' sensitivity during parent-child interactions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01261806.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.12753

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training sensitive responsiveness in parents improves the language development of children.

    “Sensitive responsiveness is a modi fi able risk factor that has been successfully trained in parents in randomized controlled trials and shown to improve the language development of children.”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) reports that training foster parents to interact sensitively with their toddlers improved the children’s receptive vocabulary. The claim generalizes this finding to parents and children broadly, and to language development beyond the receptive-vocabulary outcome measured in the trial. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Conclusions about causality can only be made in the context of experimental studies.

    “Conclusions about causality can only be made in the context of experimental studies, 58,91 -93 and approximations of causality may be derived from longitudinal designs that address directionality and temporal precedence. 94”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [93]

    The Method (Procedure; page unavailable) describes a randomized controlled trial, and the Discussion (page unavailable) says its findings offer rigorous support for a causal influence of parental sensitivity on language development. This supports the use of an experiment to draw a causal conclusion, but the paper does not say that causal conclusions can *only* be made in experimental studies. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sensitive responsiveness is a modifiable risk factor.

    “Sensitive responsiveness is a modi fi able risk factor that has been successfully trained in parents in randomized controlled trials and shown to improve the language development of children.”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [93]

  • Sensitive responsiveness has been successfully trained in parents in randomized controlled trials.

    “Sensitive responsiveness is a modi fi able risk factor that has been successfully trained in parents in randomized controlled trials and shown to improve the language development of children.”

    From Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as [93]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raby, K. L., Freedman, E., Yarger, H. A., Lind, T., & Dozier, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Raby, Kenneth Lee
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
e12753-e12753
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2892150071
Cited by
67
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Mental Health (R01MH052135)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
foster care, toddlers, language development, receptive vocabulary, parental sensitivity, early intervention, childhood adversity, parent-child interaction, preventive interventions
MeSH terms
Child, Foster, Child, Preschool, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Vocabulary, Parenting, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review