Cited by 43Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Testing two screening instruments for autism spectrum disorder in UK community child health services

Open access
Charman, Tony, Baird, Gillian, Simonoff, Emily, Chandler, Susie, Davison‐Jenkins, Abi, Sharma, Ajay, O'Sullivan, Tony, Pickles, Andrew·2016·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of two screening instruments in UK Community health services: Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M‐CHAT) and Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A two‐stage screening and in‐depth assessment procedure, combined with sampling stratification and statistical weighting, allowed the accuracy of the screens to be estimated in the entire population of referred children. Method: The study included all referrals of children aged 18 to 48 months to community paediatric and speech and language therapy services in two London districts over a 12‐month period between September 2004 and September 2005. Parents of 808 children were approached; screen data were obtained on 543 children (67.2%). A stratified subsample of 120 children received an in‐depth assessment for ASD as defined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th edition. Community clinician judgement of likely ASD was available for 98 out of the 120 children. Results: The sensitivity and specificity were 64% (95% confidence intervals; range 51–80%) and 75% (63–85%) for the SCQ, and 82% (72–92%) and 50% (33–64%) for M‐CHAT. There was no evidence that the area under the curve differed between the two screening instruments. There was also no evidence that clinician judgement of likely ASD differed from either of the screening tests. The screening tests did not perform well to confirm preliminary clinical judgement to refer (in series), nor as an alternative indicator for referral (in parallel). Interpretation: While screening tests may provide useful information, their accuracy is moderate. Screening information in isolation should not be used to make referral decisions regarding specialized ASD assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dmcn.12874

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charman, T., Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Chandler, S., Davison‐Jenkins, A., Sharma, A., O'Sullivan, T., & Pickles, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Kaleidoscope, Lewisham Centre for Children & Young People Lewisham Healthcare London UK
Corresponding author
Charman, Tony
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-25
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
369-375
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W1923677884
Cited by
43
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Health Foundation
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • King’s College London
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism screening, M-CHAT, Social Communication Questionnaire, screening accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, referral decisions, speech and language therapy services, toddlers
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Community Health Services, Female, Humans, Infant, London, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review