Cited by 30Neonatal and fetal brain pathologyMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesInfant Development and Preterm Care

Neonatal critical illness and development: white matter and hippocampus alterations in school‐age neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors

Open access
Schiller, Raisa M, van den Bosch, Gerbrich E, Muetzel, Ryan L, Smits, Marion, Dudink, Jeroen, Tibboel, Dick, Ijsselstijn, Hanneke, White, Tonya·2017·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

Aim: To examine the neurobiology of long‐term neuropsychological deficits after neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Method: This cross‐sectional study assessed white matter integrity and hippocampal volume of ECMO survivors (8–15y) and healthy children (8–17y) using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) respectively. Neuropsychological outcome was evaluated in ECMO survivors. Included clinical predictors of white matter integrity: age start ECMO, ECMO duration, highest oxygenation index before ECMO, highest mean airway pressure, and mechanical ventilation duration. Results: ECMO survivors (n=23) had lower global fractional anisotropy than healthy children (n=54) (patients=0.368; comparison group=0.381; p=0.018), but similar global mean diffusivity (p=0.410). ECMO survivors had lower fractional anisotropy in the left cingulum bundle (ECMO survivors=0.345; comparison group=0.399; p<0.001) and higher mean diffusivity in a region of the left parahippocampal cingulum (patients=0.916; comparison group=0.871; p<0.001). Higher global mean diffusivity predicted worse verbal memory in ECMO survivors (n=17) (β=–0.74, p=0.008). ECMO survivors (n=23) had smaller bilateral hippocampal volume than healthy children (n=43) (left, p<0.001; right, p<0.001) and this was related to worse verbal memory (left, β=0.65, p=0.018; right, β=0.71, p=0.006). Interpretation: Neonatal ECMO survivors are at risk for long‐term brain alterations, which may partly explain long‐term neuropsychological impairments. Neuroimaging may contribute to better risk stratification of long‐term impairments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dmcn.13309

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neonatal complications can lead to cingulum bundle diffusion changes.

    “Further support comes from the finding that neonatal complications, a common risk factor for many neuropsychiatric conditions, can lead to cingulum bundle diffusion changes (Schiller et al., 2017a,b).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Schiller et al., 2017a,b

    The DTI results report lower fractional anisotropy in the left cingulum bundle of school-age children who survived neonatal ECMO than in controls. This supports a cingulum diffusion difference after a specific neonatal critical illness, but the cross-sectional comparison does not establish that neonatal complications generally cause such changes. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. van Heijst AF, de Mol AC, Ijsselstijn H. ECMO in neonates: neuroimaging findings and outcome. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(2):104-13.
  2. Polito A, Barrett CS, Wypij D, Rycus PT, Netto R, Cogo PE, et al. Neurologic complications in neonates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. An analysis of ELSO registry data. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(9):1594-601.
  3. Raets MM, Dudink J, Ijsselstijn H, van Heijst AF, Lequin MH, Houmes RJ, et al. Brain injury associated with neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the Netherlands: a nationwide evaluation spanning two decades. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(9):884-92.
  4. Madderom MJ, Schiller, RM, Gischler, SJ, van Heijst, AF, Tibboel, D, Aarsen FK, et al. Growing up after critical illness: verbal, visual-spatial, and working memory problems in neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survivors. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1182- 1190.
  5. Madderom MJ, Reuser JJ, Utens EM, van Rosmalen J, Raets M, Govaert P, et al. Neurodevelopmental, educational and behavioral outcome at 8 years after neonatal ECMO: a nationwide multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(9):1584-93.
  6. McNally H, Bennett CC, Elbourne D, Field DJ, Group UKCET. United Kingdom collaborative randomized trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: follow-up to age 7 years. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):e845-54.
  7. Rourke PD BD, Fisk JL, Strang JD. Child neuropsychology: an introduction to theory, research, and clinical practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 1983.
  8. Cooper JM, Gadian DG, Jentschke S, Goldman A, Munoz M, Pitts G, et al. Neonatal hypoxia, hippocampal atrophy, and memory impairment: evidence of a causal sequence. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(6):1469-76.
  9. van den Bosch GE, H IJ, van der Lugt A, Tibboel D, van Dijk M, White T. Neuroimaging, Pain Sensitivity, and Neuropsychological Functioning in School-Age Neonatal Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survivors Exposed to Opioids and Sedatives. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(7):652-62.
  10. Dubois J, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Kulikova S, Poupon C, Huppi PS, Hertz-Pannier L. The early development of brain white matter: a review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience. 2014;276:48-71.
  11. Stolar CJ, Snedecor SM, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and neonatal respiratory failure: experience from the extracorporeal life support organization. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26(5):563-71.
  12. White T, El Marroun H, Nijs I, Schmidt M, van der Lugt A, Wielopolki PA, et al. Pediatric population-based neuroimaging and the Generation R Study: the intersection of developmental neuroscience and epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(1):99-111.
  13. Muetzel RL, Mous SE, van der Ende J, Blanken LM, van der Lugt A, Jaddoe VW, et al. White matter integrity and cognitive performance in school-age children: A population-based neuroimaging study. Neuroimage. 2015;119:119-28.
  14. Schmithorst VJ, Wilke M, Dardzinski BJ, Holland SK. Cognitive functions correlate with white matter architecture in a normal pediatric population: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;26(2):139-47.
  15. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate -a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met. 1995;57(1):289-300.
  16. Vogt BA, Finch DM, Olson CR. Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cereb Cortex. 1992;2(6):435-43.
  17. Wozniak JR, Krach L, Ward E, Mueller BA, Muetzel R, Schnoebelen S, et al. Neurocognitive and neuroimaging correlates of pediatric traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(5):555-68.
  18. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
  19. Wu TC, Wilde EA, Bigler ED, Yallampalli R, McCauley SR, Troyanskaya M, et al. Evaluating the relationship between memory functioning and cingulum bundles in acute mild traumatic brain injury using diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(2):303-7.
  20. Eichenbaum H. How does the brain organize memories? Science. 1997;277(5324):330-2.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiller, R. M., van den Bosch, G. E., Muetzel, R. L., Smits, M., Dudink, J., Tibboel, D., Ijsselstijn, H., & White, T.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL)
  • Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery Erasmus MC‐Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
White, Tonya
Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
304-310
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W2556262735
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ZonMw (TOP 91211021)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ECMO survivors, white matter integrity, hippocampal volume, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, cingulum, verbal memory, neuropsychological deficits, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Retrospective Studies, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Critical Illness, Survivors, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review