The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding the needs of families after NICU discharge to inform a peer support program
Open accessAbstract
Study Participants & Setting:A convenience sample of children, ages 10-18, with a diagnosis of either CP or PD were invited into this IRB approved study.Subjects were excluded if unable to read English at a 3rd grade level.Caregivers of eligible participants were also enrolled in the study.Recruitment was through outpatient clinics and a community program for children with PD.Materials/Methods: Surveys were completed by the participant and designated caregiver.Caregiver surveys included demographic information and questions about their child's motor ability, cognitive function, and comorbidities.The participant survey was a modified version of the California Bullying Victimization Scale (CBVS), 2011.This 11-item questionnaire utilized a Likert-type scale to identify whether participants were "bully-", "peer-", or "non-victims" based on the frequency of victimization over the past month and on the presence of a power imbalance.Descriptive statistics were utilized for the preliminary analysis of these surveys.Results: 51 participants met inclusion criteria for the study.44 children had a primary diagnosis of CP and 7 had a PD due to another cause (stroke, muscular dystrophy, etc.).The study included 23 males (45%) and 28 females (55%).The mean age was 14.1 years (range 10.0-18.3y),corresponding to a mean grade level of 8.4.Overall, 16% of participants were considered bully-victims, 39% peer-victims, and 45% non-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Maternal mental health is a significant issue for mothers with preterm infants who have complex emotions including feeling fearful and insecure (deSouza et al., 2010;Fratantoni et al., 2016;Murdoch & Franck 2012;Fowler et al., 2018).”
From The transition home of extremely premature babies: An integrative review (2021) · cites this paper as Fratantoni et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The transition home of extremely premature babies: An integrative review
Green, J., Fowler, C., Petty, J., & Whiting, L. (2021) · Journal of Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2020.09.011 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Venue
- Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- S5
- Pages
- 89-90
- ISSN
- 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8749
- OpenAlex
- W4236627571
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Keywords
- peer victimization, bullying, cerebral palsy, pediatric disability, children with disabilities, peer support programs, caregiver perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the needs of families after NICU discharge to inform a peer support program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/dmcn.14_13225
- The paper
- Understanding the needs of families after NICU discharge to inform a peer support program. (2016). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14_13225