The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The clinical utility of C‐peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes
Open accessAbstract
C‐peptide is produced in equal amounts to insulin and is the best measure of endogenous insulin secretion in patients with diabetes. Measurement of insulin secretion using C‐peptide can be helpful in clinical practice: differences in insulin secretion are fundamental to the different treatment requirements of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the use of C‐peptide measurement in the clinical management of patients with diabetes, including the interpretation and choice of C‐peptide test and its use to assist diabetes classification and choice of treatment. We provide recommendations for where C‐peptide should be used, choice of test and interpretation of results. With the rising incidence of Type 2 diabetes in younger patients, the discovery of monogenic diabetes and development of new therapies aimed at preserving insulin secretion, the direct measurement of insulin secretion may be increasingly important. Advances in assays have made C‐peptide measurement both more reliable and inexpensive. In addition, recent work has demonstrated that C‐peptide is more stable in blood than previously suggested or can be reliably measured on a spot urine sample (urine C‐peptide:creatinine ratio), facilitating measurement in routine clinical practice. The key current clinical role of C‐peptide is to assist classification and management of insulin‐treated patients. Utility is greatest after 3–5 years from diagnosis when persistence of substantial insulin secretion suggests Type 2 or monogenic diabetes. Absent C‐peptide at any time confirms absolute insulin requirement and the appropriateness of Type 1 diabetes management strategies regardless of apparent aetiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use and Abuse of HOMA Modeling
Wallace, T. M., Levy, J. C., & Matthews, D. R. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1487 · Cited by 5,114
International trial of the Edmonton protocol for islet transplantation
Shapiro, A. M. J., Ricordi, C., Hering, B. J., Auchincloss, H., Lindblad, R., Robertson, R. P., Secchi, A., Brendel, M. D., Berney, T., Brennan, D. C., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061267 · Cited by 1,942
Sacks, D. B., Arnold, M., Bakris, G. L., Bruns, D. E., Horvath, A. R., Kirkman, M. S., Lernmark, A., Metzger, B. E., & Nathan, D. M. (2011) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2010.161596 · Cited by 1,360
Cryer, P. E., Axelrod, L., Grossman, A. B., Heller, S. R., Montori, V. M., Seaquist, E. R., & Service, F. J. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1410 · Cited by 1,277
The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Moss, S. E., Davis, M. D., & DeMets, D. L. (1987) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33525-0 · Cited by 1,249
Gloyn, A. L., Pearson, E. R., Antcliff, J. F., Proks, P., Bruining, G. J., Slingerland, A. S., Howard, N., Srinivasan, S., Silva, J. M. C. L., Molnes, J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032922 · Cited by 1,137
Self-citationCauter, E. V., Mestrez, F., Sturis, J., & Polonsky, K. S. (1992) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.41.3.368 · Cited by 890
Improvement in outcomes of clinical islet transplantation: 1999–2010
Barton, F. B., Rickels, M. R., Alejandro, R., Hering, B. J., Wease, S., Naziruddin, B., Oberholzer, J., Odorico, J. S., Garfinkel, M. R., Levy, M., et al. (2012) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-0063 · Cited by 725
Sacks, D. B., Arnold, M., Bakris, G. L., Bruns, D. E., Horvath, A. R., Kirkman, M. S., Lernmark, A., Metzger, B. E., & Nathan, D. M. (2011) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc11-9998 · Cited by 718
Steffes, M. W., Sibley, S., Jackson, M., & Thomas, W. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.832 · Cited by 695
Cited by
DiMeglio, L. A., Evans-Molina, C., & Oram, R. A. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31320-5 · Cited by 1,561
A practical review of C-peptide testing in diabetes
Leighton, E., Sainsbury, C. A., & Jones, G. C. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0265-4 · Cited by 773
Thomas, N. J., Jones, S. E., Weedon, M. N., Shields, B. M., Oram, R. A., & Hattersley, A. T. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30362-5 · Cited by 417
Self-citationOram, R. A., Patel, K., Hill, A., Shields, B., McDonald, T. J., Jones, A., Hattersley, A. T., & Weedon, M. N. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc15-1111 · Cited by 349
Self-citationAssessment of Insulin Secretion and Insulin Resistance in Human
Park, S. Y., Gautier, J.-F., & Chon, S. (2021) · Diabetes & Metabolism Journal · doi:10.4093/dmj.2021.0220 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, A. G., & Hattersley, A. T.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 803-817
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2049583719
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical utility of C‐peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/dme.12159
- The paper
- Jones, A. G., & Hattersley, A. T. (2013). The clinical utility of C‐peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
