Cited by 68Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

Random non‐fasting C–peptide: bringing robust assessment of endogenous insulin secretion to the clinic

Open access
Hope, S. V., Knight, B. A., Shields, B. M., Hattersley, A. T., McDonald, T. J., Jones, A. G.·2016·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Background: Measuring endogenous insulin secretion using C–peptide can assist diabetes management, but standard stimulation tests are impractical for clinical use. Random non‐fasting C–peptide assessment would allow testing when a patient is seen in clinic. Methods: We compared C–peptide at 90 min in the mixed meal tolerance test (sCP) with random non‐fasting blood C–peptide (rCP) and random non‐fasting urine C–peptide creatinine ratio (rUCPCR) in 41 participants with insulin‐treated diabetes [median age 72 (interquartile range 68–78); diabetes duration 21 (14–31) years]. We assessed sensitivity and specificity for previously reported optimal mixed meal test thresholds for severe insulin deficiency (sCP < 200 pmol//l) and Type 1 diabetes/inability to withdraw insulin (< 600 pmol//l), and assessed the impact of concurrent glucose. Results: rCP and sCP levels were similar (median 546 and 487 pmol//l, P = 0.92). rCP was highly correlated with sCP, r = 0.91, P < 0.0001, improving to r = 0.96 when excluding samples with concurrent glucose < 8 mmol//l. An rCP cut‐off of 200 pmol//l gave 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity for detecting severe insulin deficiency, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99. rCP < 600 pmol//l gave 87% sensitivity and 83% specificity to detect sCP < 600 pmol//l. Specificity improved to 100% when excluding samples with concurrent glucose < 8 mmol//l. rUCPCR (0.52 nmol/mmol) was also well‐correlated with sCP, r = 0.82, P < 0.0001. A rUCPCR cut‐off of < 0.2 nmol/ mmol gave sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 93% to detect severe insulin deficiency, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98. Conclusions: Random non‐fasting C–peptide measures are strongly correlated with mixed meal C–peptide, and have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying clinically relevant thresholds. These tests allow assessment of C–peptide at the point patients are seen for clinical care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.13142

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Random C-peptide measurements are highly correlated with the gold-standard mixed meal test assessment of endogenous insulin secretion.

    “Random C-peptide measurements are highly correlated with the gold-standard mixed meal test assessment of endogenous insulin secretion70.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

  • Random measurements of levels of C-peptide are more powerful than assessment of post-glucagon and fasting blood levels of C-peptide in distinguishing type 1 diabetes mellitus from type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    “Random measurements of levels of C-peptide are more powerful than assessment of post-glucagon and fasting blood levels of C-peptide in distinguishing T1DM from T2DM70 and should therefore be used where possible in the diagnostic work-up of suspected adult-onset T1DM.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Jones AG Hattersley AT The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes Diabetic Medicine 2013 30 7 803 17 23413806 PMC3748788
  2. [2]Greenbaum C Mandrup-Poulsen T McGee P Battelino T Haastert B Ludvigsson J Mixed-meal tolerance test versus glucagon stimulation test for the assessment of beta-cell function in therapeutic trials in type 1 diabetes Diabetes care 2008 31 1966 71 18628574 PMC2551636
  3. [5]Besser R Ludvigsson J Jones A McDonald T Shields B Knight B Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio is a noninvasive alternative to the mixed-meal tolerance test in children and adults with type 1 diabetes Diabetes care 2011 34 3 607 9 21285386 PMC3041191
  4. [6]Jones A Besser R McDonald T Shields B Hope S Bowman P Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio (UCPCR) is an alternative to stimulated serum C-peptide measurement in late onset insulin treated diabetes Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association 2011 28 9 1034 8 21843301
  5. [8]Berger B S G Sundkvist G Random C-peptide in the classification of diabetes Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation 2000 60 8 687 93 11218151
  6. [9]Prior MJ Prout T Miller D Ewart R Kumar D C-peptide and the classification of diabetes mellitus patients in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Report number 6. The ETDRS Research Group Annals of epidemiology 1993 3 1 9 17 8287162
  7. [10]Service FJ Rizza RA Zimmerman BR Dyck PJ O'Brien PC Melton LJ The Classification of Diabetes by Clinical and C-Peptide Criteria: A prospective population-based study Diabetes care 1997 20 2 198 201 9118774
  8. [11]Thanabalasingham G Pal A Selwood MP Dudley C Fisher K Bingley PJ Systematic Assessment of Etiology in Adults With a Clinical Diagnosis of Young-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Is a Successful Strategy for Identifying Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Diabetes care 2012 35 6 1206 12 22432108 PMC3357216
  9. [12]Besser RE Shepherd MH McDonald TJ Shields BM Knight BA Ellard S Urinary C-peptide creatinine ratio is a practical outpatient tool for identifying hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-{alpha}/hepatocyte nuclear factor 4-{alpha} maturity-onset diabetes of the young from long-duration type 1 diabetes Diabetes care 2011 34 2 286 91 21270186 PMC3024335
  10. [13]Besser REJ Jones AG McDonald TJ Shields BM Knight BA Hattersley AT The impact of insulin administration during the mixed meal tolerance test Diabetic Medicine 2012 29 10 1279 84 22435709
  11. [14]Implementation of treatment protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Diabetes care 1995 18 3 361 76 7555480
  12. [15]Madsbad S Sauerbrey N Moller-Jensen B Krarup T Kuhl C Outcome of the glucagon test depends upon the prevailing blood glucose concentration in type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients Acta Med Scand 1987 222 1 71 4 3630779
  13. [16]McDonald TJ Perry MH Peake RW Pullan NJ O'Connor J Shields BM EDTA improves stability of whole blood C-peptide and insulin to over 24 hours at room temperature PLoS One 2012 7 7 e42084 22860060 PMC3408407

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hope, S. V., Knight, B. A., Shields, B. M., Hattersley, A. T., McDonald, T. J., & Jones, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, A. G.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-26
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1554-1558
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2341387423
Cited by
68
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Devon and Exeter Research Repository (Royal Devon and Exeter) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Northcott Devon Medical Foundation
  • NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
C-peptide, endogenous insulin secretion, mixed meal tolerance test, type 1 diabetes, insulin-treated diabetes, sensitivity and specificity, point-of-care testing
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Aged, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Male, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review